[–] vladthehampaler 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
gaga is launching a new makeup line exclusive to amazon... where's bezos in all of this?? no way his hands are clean
[–] bamadeplorable420 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
baby parts in makeup.
[–] HighEnergyLife 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
As far as I can tell he's not a jew so there's no biological predisposition to killing little kids. Bezos is a puppet himself of the ABCs tho
[–] vladthehampaler 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
with amazon's shipping reach i wouldn't be surprised if they had helped move "product" for epstein
[–] 19810708321b [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yes. But now POTUS is acknowledging it now for the first time and it's rather obvious.
[–] DickTick 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago (edited ago)
No... No it is not.. should we really look up how many ridiculous words he has used to try to embarrass the relationship of LP and PS?
I mean obviously you don't want to do that because that would make this entire post look retarded, but that doesn't change the facts..
Q gives us so much information to work with, but yet three-quarters of our non-autistic members waste 100% of their time on completely unrelated bulshit...
which really wouldn't matter at all if it wasn't for the fact that I see that same bullshit get repeated as fact from that point on thousands of times now...
[–] see_ess 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
she did a collaboration with R Kelly earlier this year? coincidence? https://news.yahoo.com/lady-gaga-r-kelly-collaboration-160502572.html
[–] ThreeBladedKnife 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
Her name was reported to have been in the flight logs (Stefini Germanotta).
[–] SeanBox 3 points 3 points 6 points (+6|-3) ago
I don’t think that’s what that means. I do personally think she is shady too but this tweet isn’t proof of anything.
[–] DanaNordic 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Some have been following the awakening a bit more closely. Lady GaGa is involved with Marina Abramovich ~ not innocent.
[–] SeanBox 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I realize that. I just feel like that’s reading too much into this tweet.
[–] 19810708321b [S] 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago
Of all the words to use? He chooses Gaga?
[–] divine_human ago
gaga is a pretty common word. i sense that in case he really wanted to point to 'lady gaga', he would have used a capital G.
[–] Joe10jo 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
No shit! I’m 48 and have never had a reason to use that word, neither do my kids, and I guarantee ya a man of Trump’s caliber says it for a very specific reason. He’s calling her out.
[–] toobaditworks 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
He is talking about the texts with Lisa Page and Peter Strzok. Gaga in love means crazy in love. Crazy lovers.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gaga
It means crazy.
example: