0
1

[–] Wooden_door 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

So if it doesnt water on your crops, they're withholding the rain?

So the government is taking responsibility for global warming I take it.

0
1

[–] acheron2012 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

There is no such thing as "a little government". This is a marvelous black pill. For every time morality wins in America today evil wins 10,000 times.

While there is life there is always the possibility of turning things around. But stories like this show how very very far away that goal is.

0
12

[–] Orneryoldgoat 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

The government thinks they do until a lawyer from Nestle's tells them otherwise.

0
4

[–] vastrightwing 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Correct. Nestle's pays the government a vig so they can drain municipal water supplies to zero for profit.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] cT9NlRLhxlyr 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

This isn't a cistern, it's a 4 million gallon lake.

0
2

[–] captainstrange 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

You keep repeating this like a salty communist faggot that doesn't comprehend property rights.

The state doesn't own the rain bitch.

2
-1

[–] thelma 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Its the west ... they get almost free electricity from the gov't controlling their water.

Now they don't like the gov't controlling their water.

0
6

[–] Bryanhance 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I dont get it just say no if they force their way on your property thats tresspassing which is the greater crime. Collectingnwater or trespassing hint one can get you shot

0
4

[–] Raxotic 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

They fly over our place (1000's of acres) and collect areal photos. If you change anything, they'll know.

1
4

[–] Planetoftheclown 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

You can't protect an on going crime with property rights. Water rights are a complex topic in the west.

It's fucked up, but they moved there. They should have investigated more. In a lot of places when you purchase the land you do not automatically own the mineral rights.

On the other hand, I don't know how a pond denies the state the water in the first place especially when being used for irrigation since it will return naturally to the watershed.

0
6

[–] vastrightwing 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Exactly. It's all about government asserting its rights over and above citizen's. Schools take parental rights away because they can. Courts force parents to make their children change their gender because they can. They force you to vaccinate your children because the pharmaceutical companies can require it. They tax your property because they can. And when they run out of money due to over spending they tax the rain water running off your property because they can.

1
1

[–] Raxotic 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

This. It doesn't matter what the pond does. They don't have water rights, so they have no legal ground. Case closed.

0
4

[–] DestroyerOfSaturn 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Derram? Think that's the right name. Please make script that turns all these posts into auto-archive links. Thanks. Most likely the wrong place to bring this up. Anyways, couple should've stood their ground. Lavoy finicum style.

0
0

[–] Niggardly_Jew ago 

@Derram only archives sites that he considers "bad" from what I understand. It would be nice if he archived everything but I don't know what his processing power / server / bot is capable of.

0
2

[–] emmanuelgoldstien [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Sad. RIP Lavoy finicum

0
15

[–] Niggardly_Jew 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

Destroy the government.

1
1

[–] Honey_Pot 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

That is (((their))) Plan, then replace with a New World Disorder.

load more comments ▼ (9 remaining)