[–] tokui 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Potheads.
The plan was to grow pot. They saw the pond, figured it was grandfathered in. They bought the land, but the clerks office found out it wasn't permitted when they applied for pot license.
They need to drain the pond. Apply for permit meanwhile.
They grow "medical cannabis" and give it away to friends. My ass. The plan from day one was to build a pot farm $$$.
[–] captainstrange 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
hey look, a fucking commie who doesn't believe in property rights.
What a fucking surprise.
[–] cthulian_axioms 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The proper response in this scenario is to drown the government official who ordered the destruction of the water supply. I GOT YER FUCKIN' WATER RIGHT HERE
[–] FlyinToadstar 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The owner should designate the pond area as a dry storage silo and then charge the government daily rental and/or for drainage costs associated with "their" water intrusion. If the government isn't wiling to move their water off-site it seems a fourth amendment violation and unreasonable government intrusion onto private property.
[–] Grunge 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I posted something like this on my little sub v/ifitpleasesthecrown
[–] Pooh_on_a_Jew 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Land of the (((Free)))