What the fuck information overload are you talking about when "you control what media they consume". I had never even seen a scary movie until I was 11 or 12. Bedtime when I was really young (5-9) was 8 and then later on 9pm, we were allowed to watch maybe 1 or 2 tv shows a day. Honestly we were so exhausted from running around outside all afternoon we barely made it that late anyway.
You're as bad as the fat kids parents who have no idea how that happened. Couldn't be the free access to all the junk food kept stocked in the kitchen... Lazy parenting is just as bad as neglectful parenting when you are in a society with a government, media, and education system actively trying to corrupt your children. Of course it takes extra effort to fight back.
I was also exposed to libtardation throughout school and the media, but because of my upbringing I never switched sides. I considered it sure, but if you can think for yourself none of the arguments on the left hold up, even to children. Even in highschool the majority of students were conservative in my area (central valley of california). I'm not counting all the migrant children, I'm sure every last one was demonrat brainwashed from the get go, which is why none of us still live in California.
[–] SurfinMindWaves ago
I say that because you can control what your own children are exposed to, but once they have contact with other children who do have access to all that they learn it anyway. You can keep them from having contact for a certain amount of time, but unless you are Amish chances are they will still be influenced by peers.
[–] nobslob ago
There are plenty of children that are not corrupted by exposure to other children, without resorting to becoming amish. You can minimize the possibility by choosing neighborhoods with higher levels of conservatives to start.