3
-2

[–] Alderwolf 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

As Q like to say, these people are stupid.

1
1

[–] LakotaPride [S] 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Patriot, I get the impression they are brain dead.

0
0

[–] ssgrader ago 

there is no article . i think it was scrubbed

0
0

[–] LakotaPride [S] ago 

Patriot, appears they did scrub the article, because they no longer have it posted when I went back and checked.

0
0

[–] ssgrader ago 

My account was SUSPENDED it is now noon and not one word from twitter as to WHY the suspended my account.. NO EMAIL NO NOTIFICATION OF ANY KIND .. Any good LAW fags want to help us sue the shit out of Jack? the only way we can win this is to sue EVERY time they do this...

0
0

[–] LakotaPride [S] ago 

I agree Patriot, this is how to fight back. Patriots please advise our patriot here on this, especially if you know good Attys to contact.

0
1

[–] ssgrader 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I just found out why my account was suspended >james rader @jamesrader64 @RepMaxineWaters You committed TREASON you SHOULD HANG... want to keep opening your mouth hun?

Fact : the U.S. is in a DECLARED WAR. > Congress voted on the WAR ON TERROR Fact we are still engaging the enemy in this declared war Article 4 sec 4 , Second Clause, “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.\

” This clause guarantees that the federal government will assure and provide these three protections to all State governments:

  1. Republican Form of Government;
  2. Protection Against Invasion; and
  3. Protection of Legislatures and Executive from domestic Violence.

How do Open Borders guarantee protection of Invasion? > sanctuary states/cities? > No prosecution of any kind for crossing the border? Remember we are in a War.. So these acts are in fact acts of TREASON What does the Constitution AND the UCMJ proscribe as Punishment? SO twitter is now giving AID COMFORT and PROTECTION to the DEEP STATE our ENEMY ANY LAWYERS want to help?

0
0

[–] Anon331717 ago 

Didn’t SCOTUS just rule that the president can’t block anyone?

1
0

[–] 19700555? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Just go to qmap.pub - you can access all POTUS tweets there and bypass Twitler altogether.

0
2

[–] LakotaPride [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

yes Patriot, we can do that, but we should not have to do that. This is America, if Jack likes it that way, then Jack can Pack, and move to China.

0
1

[–] 19701845? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Jack interfered in our elections and helped facilitate human trafficking. No need to pack for maximum security.

0
1

[–] ArcAngel 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

are we really suprised at this point?

0
1

[–] LakotaPride [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Not really , Patriot.

0
1

[–] ArcAngel 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

0
1

[–] anotherrussianbot 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Under the logic that the tech companies are private and need not provide access for all speech, had a few companies held a monopoly on printing presses, they could simply have denied Thomas Paine access and stifled him. Fuck these tech companies and their censorship.

0
1

[–] LakotaPride [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Patriot, this is where the Federal Judge's ruling caught them, they can not claim to be a social gathering site, and then attack free speech.

1
1

[–] BadPenny 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

They stepped right into a trap. Love it. 'These people are stupid'

0
1

[–] LakotaPride [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Appears so Patriot, amazing how SCOTUS ruled president Trump can not ban, but all of a sudden Jack believes he can. Claims to be a social media gathering place, which a Federal Judge ruled over a year ago, they can not claim to be a social media gathering place, and then attack free speech, as it falls under false advertisement.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)