0
0

[–] 19672567? ago 

You'd sure hate to see WW3 started tomorrow wouldn't ya, Chuck?

0
0

[–] 19667457? ago 

Lefkowitz- one of Epstein's lawyer- wrote this letter to Epstein thanking him for keeping their deal secret and the victimized girls in the dark about it

“I also want to thank you for the commitment you made to me during our October 12 meeting in which you . . . assured me that your Office would not . . . contact any of the identified individuals, potential witnesses, or potential civil claimants and their respective counsel in this matter.”

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5746048/Epstein.pdf

For 'researchers' you guys sure do very little of it.

0
0

[–] 19667019? ago 

He wants to get out in front of the shit-storm that's about to hit.

0
0

[–] 19665784? ago 

Where did Acosta “testify?” Was there a hearing or court proceeding? Not that I’m a aware of. He had a press conference today, but that isn’t testifying. Are you stupid?

0
0

[–] 19665737? ago 

The U.S. attorney who oversaw the hedge fund mogul pedophile's prosecution reveals exclusively to The Daily Beast how Jeffrey Epstein got off with a slap on the wrist. https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epstein-how-the-hedge-fund-mogul-pedophile-got-off-easy

0
0

[–] 19665263? ago 

Acosta came across to me as a smarmy, not my fault, how dare you question my authority piece of government SHIT.

0
0

[–] 19663278? ago 

Hmm, and here I thought it made Trump look bad for hiring the guy. He tried to cut 80% of the anti trafficking budget too

0
1

[–] 19665918? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

We already know much of the budget was placed into slush funds for nefarious activities. It is possible Acosta was aware the anti-trafficking budget had been compromised and much went into such slush funds.

0
1

[–] 19664758? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Who? Acosta? Sauce?

0
1

[–] 19682287? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

According to Fox news, Acosta has lots of questions to answer. One of those is, what did he took this unusual action with Epstein in 2008? As we look at it now in 2019, Epstein absolutely did NOT deserve such unusual action. Source video at 2 minutes at https://www.foxnews.com/us/labor-secretary-facing-capitol-hill-hot-seat-over-epstein-deal-possible-break-in-missing-kentucky-mom-case.amp

As you know back in 2008 it was Obama's administration. Not Trump.

Acosta was invited to testify at a July 23 hearing that will examine his actions related to Epstein

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)