[–]chirogonemd0 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
You need to check out Thunderbolt's Project. A ton of content there.
Practically, it would undue the Einsteinian model of cosmology, namely that we live in a universe that is based on gravity. It doesn't refute the existence of gravity as a force, just that it is what drives the behavior of the universe at the macro scale, the idea being that a great deal of the observations we've made of behavior of very large objects like galaxies isn't explained adequately by gravitation. What EU attempts to show is that these things are explained quite well by electromagnetism, and it asserts that EM is the fundamental force in the universe. Where modern physicists are looking to find a solution due to the effects of some cryptic sort of matter: dark matter/energy, the EU theory is saying we don't need to posit this multiplicity of causes when the phenomenon can be explained by electromagnetism.
It has massive implications for climate, as the relationship between the sun and the planets is viewed quite differently. The sun acts like a capacitor whose electronic behavior across time is the main driver of climate change on earth.
It also hearkens to Tesla, insofar as if the physics of the cosmos are primarily electric, then what we typically think of as the vacuum is more akin to the older concepts of the ether and abundant energy should be available everywhere. If true it would be a massive threat to the energy monopolies of the globe.
It also would threaten to change our entire knowledge of the history of our solar system, and they assert that the solar system looked much differently at past time's in earth's history. They discuss cataclysmic events that occurred which are not predicted by our current models.
I'm not sure that I agree with it yet. I don't have the expertise to make a truly informed decision. I do find it very interesting though, and what I can say is this: the contributors to the theory and to that channel don't seem to be liars. What I mean is they are authentic, they care, and they are at least supportive of skepticism, which the modern academic clergy is not. This alone signifies something to me that appears to be missing from modern science today, especially the metaphysicians calling themselves theoretical physicists. It's probably on account of the fact I am a dirty layman, but there is a major philosophical focus with EU on the importance of empiricism and abstractions that can be physically modeled, i.e. actually observed.
[–] chirogonemd 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
You need to check out Thunderbolt's Project. A ton of content there.
Practically, it would undue the Einsteinian model of cosmology, namely that we live in a universe that is based on gravity. It doesn't refute the existence of gravity as a force, just that it is what drives the behavior of the universe at the macro scale, the idea being that a great deal of the observations we've made of behavior of very large objects like galaxies isn't explained adequately by gravitation. What EU attempts to show is that these things are explained quite well by electromagnetism, and it asserts that EM is the fundamental force in the universe. Where modern physicists are looking to find a solution due to the effects of some cryptic sort of matter: dark matter/energy, the EU theory is saying we don't need to posit this multiplicity of causes when the phenomenon can be explained by electromagnetism.
It has massive implications for climate, as the relationship between the sun and the planets is viewed quite differently. The sun acts like a capacitor whose electronic behavior across time is the main driver of climate change on earth.
It also hearkens to Tesla, insofar as if the physics of the cosmos are primarily electric, then what we typically think of as the vacuum is more akin to the older concepts of the ether and abundant energy should be available everywhere. If true it would be a massive threat to the energy monopolies of the globe.
It also would threaten to change our entire knowledge of the history of our solar system, and they assert that the solar system looked much differently at past time's in earth's history. They discuss cataclysmic events that occurred which are not predicted by our current models.
I'm not sure that I agree with it yet. I don't have the expertise to make a truly informed decision. I do find it very interesting though, and what I can say is this: the contributors to the theory and to that channel don't seem to be liars. What I mean is they are authentic, they care, and they are at least supportive of skepticism, which the modern academic clergy is not. This alone signifies something to me that appears to be missing from modern science today, especially the metaphysicians calling themselves theoretical physicists. It's probably on account of the fact I am a dirty layman, but there is a major philosophical focus with EU on the importance of empiricism and abstractions that can be physically modeled, i.e. actually observed.
[–] Phantom42 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Annnnd saved.
Thanks, guy.