[–] 19617897? ago (edited ago)
Let me guess... Hillary? Ha.
This is like that time MJ12 claimed they'd be making "an appearance" at the 4th of July celebration and any potential evidence was already weaker than plausible due to poor weather, lights, lasers, fireworks and smoke. Fuck right off with that shit.
[–] 19617872? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I suspect that the reason we have not been seeing to many Q posts is that to many are monitoring Q. I would not be surprised if the Q team tried to set up a different way of leaking info using twitter and youtube...it would not be a back channel because Q would not be referenced in the leak or used to gain authority with the public.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
[–] 19618045? 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago
That be you, that you are smelling
Imagine when the shills don their bug-eyed little adam schitt look, that is heading their way.
Bug-eyed all the way out to there. Magical times unfolding. Consider a cannonball into the much awaited light/love that Trump is leading us into. The GREAT AWAKENING Better than advertised Better than you can imagine.
[–] 19618104? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
here's the deal. 40Head is legit. He's been in front of a few major things recently; however, what is annoying is when those who might be in-the-know begin using things like "operational safety" as if they are part of the team. When these guys start grouping themselves into the Q Team, they just come off as wanna-bes. I believe 40Head knows. I don't believe "operational security" is part of his call.
[–] 19618419? 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Have source
They tell you information
If you leak that specific information, it will clearly be a breach of secrecy requirements for whoever your source works for, or for whoever gave your source that information
If you leak it, they will suddenly get in trouble. You may lose your source, they may lose their job (if they're lucky). AAAnd it distracts people doing an important job by having to play hunt the mole rather than do their work
If you merely give vague hints which let others know the gist, but do not break operational secrecy of your sources organisation, there is no real harm done, and as such no need for any of the stuff mentioned above to happen
Ta-da. operational safety in a nutshell. I doubt he's saying it because he actually feels in personal threat. But don't underestimate how easily his sources could get fucked if he leaked information they gave him.
source : I know a fair few intel twitter people, albeit from the more general geopolitics side of things
[–] 19617941? 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
it does appear there may be a second defendent: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/whoa-clinton-library-refuses-to-hand-over-information-on-bill-clintons-ties-to-jeffrey-epstein/
[–] 19620713? 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Are you fucking high? Do you not know a bullshit story when you read one?
[–] 19621669? ago
did you read the link you fucking asshole. seriously...no class!