0
0

[–] bertram_wilberforce ago 

k

k, no problem.

Just something to think about perhaps. When you try to debase a point solely by the virtue that it originates from a member of the 'enemy' (i.e. that fatty quoted in the screenshot), are you aware that you're debasing your own argument as well by proxy, if both arguments fall in the same line?
That's a rookie mistake i see a lot of misty-eyed young idealists falling into. Beware, SJW (idiocy) lies ahead.

0
0

[–] MathunBeag ago 

Rules 2, 3, and 4 so far.

0
0

[–] bertram_wilberforce ago  (edited ago)

Rule 2: - who started which dissent?

Rule 3: - see above

Rule 4: - do point out any instance, sergeant.

0
0

[–] bertram_wilberforce ago  (edited ago)

I might be old but not that amnesiac yet. I can tell apart FPH from Spiked from Paypal.

You may want to guard your inclusive plurals though, some of us have bigger fish to hate. I hate fat as much as the next person, yet my hate for the SJW mentality overrides even that. Priorities, y'see. Even though there's a huge overlap between fat and SJW, the latter takes precedence when it comes to hate. The lack of precedence you may translate as sympathy all you like, i'm sticking to it.

Now go back & re-read the screen-shot in the OP.
Can you argue with the content?
If not, then don't.

0
0

[–] MathunBeag ago 

k