0
0

[–] derram ago 

https://archive.ph/08Yot :

2019-06-18 | Justice Thomas urges U.S. Supreme Court to feel free to reverse precedents - Reuters

'Casey, which reaffirmed Roe and said states cannot place an undue burden on the constitutional right to an abortion recognized in the Roe decision. '

'But even Scalia, a conservative who died in 2016, had a different view of stare decisis. '

'In a concurring opinion, which no other justice joined, Thomas referred to the court’s 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. '

'Wade.”The Thomas opinion focused on “stare decisis,” a Latin term referring to the legal principle that U.S. courts should not overturn precedents without a special reason. '

'The court now has a 5-4 conservative majority, and Thomas is among its most conservative justices. '


This has been an automated message.

0
1

[–] thelma 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Thomas have reversed quite a few of them.

LOL

Just goes to show....courts are total bullshit. Especially when it comes to examining rights which they have no jurisdiction to regulate.

And people who have been paying attention to this issue knows its a precursor to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Which is certainly bad case law that needs to be reversed.