0
1

[–] 19221360? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I had a bad feeling about him. I'm very sad I was right.

1
-1

[–] 19221350? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Could this be a ploy to discredit a future military tribunal judge?

0
0

[–] 19221043? ago 

Bad Dog Mattis

0
1

[–] 19220822? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Let's think critically. General officers judges and high level bureaucrats didn't get where they are with being part of the club and compromised.

0
0

[–] 19221533? ago 

Bullshit!(doesnt need explained either) SMFH......

0
0

[–] 19221143? [S] ago  (edited ago)

There better not be in the Trump administration. You are sounding like a normie who expects evil and corruption from all of them, even Trump's people. You cannot successfully prosecute a crime of the magnitude we are dealing with in this whole debacle unless your top person in the defence dept is a white hat. Nuff said.

1
-1

[–] 19221498? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

What about all the corrupt trump appointees?

0
0

[–] 19221388? ago 

defense*

0
0

[–] 19221059? ago 

Exactly

0
1

[–] 19220688? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It was a sole source contract (ie non-competitively awarded). If he’s a black hat, this is not the smoking gun.

0
0

[–] 19223180? ago 

actually, it indicates the exact opposite of what you conclude

0
3

[–] 19221096? [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

That's just the point. Their rules stipulate it has to have competitive bids. The bid was custom designed to only fit Amazon so that no one else could be considered. I have done government bids and know the rules. Mattis' underling got a lucrative job with Amazon upon completion of the deal, which was negotiated while he was still at the DoD. This deal alone does not make Mattis a black hat but the fact that he did it that way is an indication that he was already one before the deal was struck. Also, why was his dinner covered up and only revealed by accident through un-redaction? I smell bad blood but can't prove it. This is just one of my me reasons for suspicion, there are other reasons to doubt him that I don't want to get into at this moment.

0
1

[–] 19221582? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Bingo! excuse the FB closet socialist before you. ^ ^ ^

0
0

[–] 19221366? ago  (edited ago)

I should have stipulated that I find the sole source nature of the award shady AF and have zero love for Bezos. However, if Amazons technology readiness level of AWS far surpassed that of its competitors, that is areasonable (and lawful) justification for a sole source determination.

However, I thought I saw an article about 6 months ago where a ?criminal? Investigation was launched by DOJ into this award- but I can find anything with a simple search.

Does this sound familiar to you (or anyone)?

1
0

[–] 19220540? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

This isn’t out of the ordinary nor is it a scandal. There are much bigger issues than this on which to focus.

0
0

[–] 19222916? ago 

Amazon owns treacherous WaPo.

1
0

[–] 19220493? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Man Trump really does only hire the best.

0
1

[–] 19220789? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

the best at the time. never late to expose the pseudo ones

0
3

[–] 19220514? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

It's not like previous administrations weren't hiring corrupt actors. At least Trump fires them before the public finds out.

0
0

[–] 19222436? ago 

Like Zinke and Pruitt

0
17

[–] 19220468? 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

That's really unfortunate. I thought Mattis was well-respected in the military and wasn't known for corruption.

When even Mattis is selling out to big tech, it's no wonder our country is such shit.

0
15

[–] 19222051? 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

Former Marine here. Mattis has almost god-like status in the Marine Corps. There are legendary stories about his leadership and care for his Marines. Marines also love him because he is a respected warrior and known to not be PC. Word on the street was he was not selected to be commandant because of this one reason alone. However, I have always been suspect of him, because I don't trust any of our generals. I have seen first hand that most of them are careerists and politicians. You don't get to that level on ability alone. It's a tight group, and they select who gets to come into their ranks. I also saw so many examples of disastrous PC polices pushed from them...more than I can count. I was disappointed when Trump picked Mattis because I know he is a hawk, sat on the corrupt board of the Theranos company with other deep-state globalists, and criticized Trump for not expanding the already bloated military and starting more wars, especially with Syria.

Be cautious not to put too much trust in any military general or career military person. In all my time in the Marines, I only knew a few people who had even the smallest awareness of what is truly going on in the world.

0
0

[–] 19227863? ago 

Blue collar civilian here. You have summed up my take on all of these brass wigs, including flynn. There is nothing good or to trust that comes from the Department of War. Nothing.

especially Paytriots.

0
1

[–] 19224237? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Good info. Any sauce on Gen. John Kelly? Any shady stuff we should know about?

0
0

[–] 19222965? ago 

Which if that is the state of the military branches at the general rank, that really seems to cast doubt on the whole back story that is associated with origin of Q and Donald Trump being approached to run for presidency.

Makes it look like any actual patriotic leadership (i.e., not aligned with the globalist) is thin to nearly non-existent

There were all those military officers that Obama purged, but they wouldn't even be in any position of power any longer. So that means just the ilk that the likes of Obama would trust are what is left

The Q disinfo may in part then been to greatly exaggerate the whole Q back story stuff, so to speak - IOW, the only real substantive support POTUS Trump has are we the rank and file of the public - and, of course, his own guile

0
2

[–] 19221884? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

General Dunford is the only one that matters. He's like Admiral Rogers in the sense they're staying away from the spotlight to pull the strings.

0
4

[–] 19221523? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Rise and Shine cupcake,there is no position of authrority that isnt corrupt. Find a red pill and take two.

3
-3

[–] 19221617? 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

Another corrupt Trump appointee. I’m not even surprised anymore

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)