0
0

[–] 7e62ce85 [S] ago 

We do. (Paper link for 56% discrimination against blacks by banks)

  1. The paper flat out ignores data it itself states: "By themselves, lower wealth and income need not imply lower qualifications, since borrowers with lower incomes and wealth tend to purchase less expensive homes. Though the median loan-to-income ratio of minorities is higher (2.45) than whites (2.03)"
  2. "The Boston model assigns the same probability of unemployment to everyone in the same industry, whether clerk or chief executive officer. " (From another evaluating paper)
  3. The paper doesn't mention IQ at all. This means minorities could have shown up speaking ebonics for all we know.
  4. "data consistently show that non-Asian minority home mortgage application denial rates are two to three times higher than those for whites." Why not look at Asians hmmm?

This is from a brief view into the matter. While I won't rule out discrimination may happen this is not convincing. Maybe if they checked IQ and Asians as well and the rate difference was 100+%.

We don't treat children the same as adults or men the same as children. It would not be a just system if we did.

If you are old enough to commit the crime you are old enough to serve the time.

Emergency Nation law shall be applied equally to all intelligent agents whether black, white, child or AI. That is my final position; not even a demon shall be presumed guilty without evidence, nor an angel innocent in spite of it.

It doesn't ban free speech, it prohibits pollution of the common trust through error, bias, decrepit, delusion, framing, loading, overloading, lying by omission, conflation, and lack of due diligence in these things.

You would need 10 lawyers to order a burger. It's insane. Easily exploitable by a corrupt state. Any political opponent could be thrown in jail for "smearing" for example. Completely insane and unworkable.

every European descended could sue for to compensate for the damage to their reputation

More insanity. "Muh reparations!" It would be a nation entirely of lawyers for about a week before starving to death.

0
0

[–] BlackSheepBrouhaha ago 

I'll never understand why lying and treating different things the same are considered rights. The only universal laws are Natural laws, and even they can be harnessed by the wise. Nature doesn't treat us as equals, it treats us as we are.

0
0

[–] 7e62ce85 [S] ago 

I'll never understand why lying and treating different things the same are considered rights.

  1. The problem with lying etc. is that you usually cannot prove it. If it was so simple we would not need scientific philosophy and the scientific method.
  2. Treating things the same. Society is like a game. A game has rules that must be followed. If a player is allowed to cheat the game ceases to be fun and no one will play. Even if the cheater would have won anyway you cannot allow cheating in systems.