[–] 19080845? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Because, because,,,, BECAUSE, why not. They want to ban shit? Then ban this. At this point, what difference does it make. If I want to silence my muzzle and suppress the fire, I can do that anyway. Just like banning bump stocks. I can make mine FULL auto with a paper clip. If I wanted to that is....
[–] 19081137? 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
Another retard who doesn't understand what it means when a politician says "I'll look at it."
[–] 19081868? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Just like bumpstocks, huh?
[–] 19087611? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Like i said "retard." POTUS was ambushed with a question on "silencers" which should have been "suppressors" if the "journalist" knew wtf he was talking about. POTUS avoided the question with "we'll look at it."
Bumpstocks were a hot issue after Vegas. POTUS negotiates. Guns are protected under the constitution, not accessories. There was room to negotiate and shut the sjw's up. No one wanted the retards marching on Washington and they went away.