[–] ForTheUltimate ago
So do you still believe in your post scarcity bullshit?
Because if you do, you're too stupid or irrational.
Look. 200 years ago, aluminum was so scarce it was worth MORE than gold. Napoleon ate off of aluminum plates instead of fancy silver, gold, or porcelain because it was so valuable.
and it is still scarce today.
There's no reason why we can't apply that to many many other things.
They will still be scarce.
MOST common things that most everyone needs will be already figured out and those things will be cheap.
Food was made incredibly cheap in 200 years, yet it is stills scarce.
still cost SOMETHING, but the cost will be irrelevant because it's NOT SCARCE
No, if it costs something, it's scarce. Scarce doesn't mean very scarce. it means any scarcity at all.
[–] Master_Foo 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
You are arguing semantics like an autistic sperg. Nobody defines "post scarcity" as "an infinite supply". It just means everyone can easily obtain it cheaply.
I challenge you to find an economist who speaks of "post scarcity" as if he means what you mean.
I challenge you to find a person who is desperate for aluminum. Even a machinist is going to tell you he has absolutely no problem finding all the aluminum he can feed through his machines at a very reasonable price.
[–] ForTheUltimate ago (edited ago)
Nigger. if it's no infinite, it's limited.
No good economist would speak of post scarcity in the first place. Only idiots can serve as authoritative example for your idiotic idea.
Now fuck off