…continued
At the same time, YouTube and its parent company, (((Alphabet))), are under growing political pressure to rein in the bad actors on the platform. The Christchurch attacks in March led to widespread criticism of YouTube and other platforms for failing to immediately identify and remove videos of the shooting, and several countries have proposed laws designed to force tech companies to act more quickly. Meanwhile, (((The New York Times))) found this week that YouTube algorithms were recommending videos featuring children in bathing suits to people who had previously watched sexually themed content — effectively generating playlists for pedophiles.
YouTube did not disclose the names of any channels that are expected to be affected by the change. The company declined to comment on a current controversy surrounding my Vox colleague Carlos Maza, who has repeatedly been harassed on the basis of his race and sexual orientation by prominent right-wing commentator (((Steven Crowder.))) (After I spoke with the company, it responded to Maza that it plans to take no action against Crowder’s channel.)
Still, the move is likely to trigger panic among right-wing YouTube channels. In the United States, conservatives have promoted the idea that YouTube and other platforms discriminate against them. Despite the fact that there is no evidence of systematic bias, Republicans have held several hearings over the past year on the subject. Today’s move from YouTube is likely to generate a fresh round of outrage, along with warnings that we are on the slippery slope toward totalitarianism.
Of course, as the Maza case has shown, YouTube doesn’t always enforce its own rules. It’s one thing to make a policy, and it’s another to ensure that a global workforce of underpaid contractors accurately understands and applies it. It will be fascinating to see how the new policy, which prohibits “videos alleging that a group is superior in order to justify … segregation or exclusion,” will affect discussion of immigration on YouTube. The company says that political debates about the pros and cons of immigration are still allowed, but a video saying that “Muslims are diseased and shouldn’t be allowed to migrate to Europe” will be banned.
The changed policy goes into effect today, YouTube said, and enforcement will “ramp up” over the next several days.
Archive: http://archive.fo/0hfWC
[–] 19061078? ago
Daily reminder that this isn't happening in response to Trump, it is happening UNDER Trump. These media tech entities have fully fallen in line with the Trump administration and its censorship/propaganda efforts against both Iran and Venezuela and they are in line with the Trump administration here.
[–] 19061111? ago
I think its both, its partially in response to Trump and Trump is allowing it to happen.
Rather I think it would make more sense to say that Trump has fallen under the deep-state, legit wouldn't be surprised if Trump was actually already dead and has been replaced by a lookalike.
[–] 19072940? ago
OUT OF HERE, MAGANIGGER
[–] 19061119? ago
Daily reminder that this is a false narrative pushed by trumpniggers and conservative retards who want to distract you from Donald Trump's clear track record over decades prior to his presidential run of being an open agent of zion.