[–] 19015398? 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
Every intelligence agency in the world, including the Dems & Left & Deep State & MSM are constantly reading Qmap.pub and QRV on a daily basis to try and stay one step ahead in the narrative that is Trump vs the World. That’s the nature of the business and using a psyop to communicate with the base. 95% of Q posts are bullshit and misinformation - but on purpose because of the audience these sites have.
You cannot take anything that comes out as a Q post as factual. If you do, you need to stop coming here and stick to getting your information from CNN. You are not ready for prime time and neither are 90% of the viewers on here.
[–] 19015234? 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
The thing is, it’s data points that encircle the enemy. We have enough parts of the full picture that if Q ever is validated they have to start defending them selves and we have mountains of evidence against them. So it’s a tool to apply selective public pressure. Any time Q needs a target unmasked in public he need only leak enough to enable us to research the hell out of them. We are a weapon and this is a slow and cautious game of chess.
Do you jump on them right away and scatter the flock or do you encircle them and corral them before the pack takes its prey?
We peel off a lamb here or there when Q needs. We are all ready to strike when the call comes. This is more powerful than acting in haste. We can make them destroy them selves.
[–] 19016942? [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I hate to ruin your metaphors but if the individuals are truly guilty of the crimes stated, such as treason, child trafficking, pedophilia, or even cannibalism; do we really think it will take an exaggerated dance to convince the public? The more we feel lke we have to "set up" the optics, the more it makes me disbelieve in the accusation. If they're truly evil enough, then it will be easy and obvious to any person, no matter the speed in which we reveal information
[–] 19016976? ago
Ignore the optics. I’m talking about the legal net that’s closing on them. You could smear every one with public disclosure and it would be a clear abuse of power and you’d have to throw out all of the evidence and we would know who was bad and who was good with no recourse to address it.
How does intelligence become evidence?
Remember how this all works. You have to have parallel discovery. That’s a mountain to climb of its own. You can’t just reach into the nsa database and star rounding people up. That would shred the very foundations of our legal system.