0
4

[–] 19015234? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The thing is, it’s data points that encircle the enemy. We have enough parts of the full picture that if Q ever is validated they have to start defending them selves and we have mountains of evidence against them. So it’s a tool to apply selective public pressure. Any time Q needs a target unmasked in public he need only leak enough to enable us to research the hell out of them. We are a weapon and this is a slow and cautious game of chess.

Do you jump on them right away and scatter the flock or do you encircle them and corral them before the pack takes its prey?

We peel off a lamb here or there when Q needs. We are all ready to strike when the call comes. This is more powerful than acting in haste. We can make them destroy them selves.

0
1

[–] 19016942? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Do you jump on them right away and scatter the flock or do you encircle them and corral them before the pack takes its prey?

I hate to ruin your metaphors but if the individuals are truly guilty of the crimes stated, such as treason, child trafficking, pedophilia, or even cannibalism; do we really think it will take an exaggerated dance to convince the public? The more we feel lke we have to "set up" the optics, the more it makes me disbelieve in the accusation. If they're truly evil enough, then it will be easy and obvious to any person, no matter the speed in which we reveal information

0
0

[–] 19016976? ago 

Ignore the optics. I’m talking about the legal net that’s closing on them. You could smear every one with public disclosure and it would be a clear abuse of power and you’d have to throw out all of the evidence and we would know who was bad and who was good with no recourse to address it.

How does intelligence become evidence?

Remember how this all works. You have to have parallel discovery. That’s a mountain to climb of its own. You can’t just reach into the nsa database and star rounding people up. That would shred the very foundations of our legal system.

1
0

[–] 19015275? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

They say if a monkey was to type random shit into a keyboard for a long time, the monkey would write Shakespeares given enough time.

1
-1

[–] 19015898? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Liberal logic

AOC couldn't do that with the book directly in front of her, she thinks Shakespeare involves a snow globe.

0
0

[–] 19016913? [S] ago  (edited ago)

Nobody cares about AOC as much as conservatives and qanon. She's not influential, she is treated like a queen around here whenever she speaks

2
0

[–] 19015398? 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

Every intelligence agency in the world, including the Dems & Left & Deep State & MSM are constantly reading Qmap.pub and QRV on a daily basis to try and stay one step ahead in the narrative that is Trump vs the World. That’s the nature of the business and using a psyop to communicate with the base. 95% of Q posts are bullshit and misinformation - but on purpose because of the audience these sites have.

You cannot take anything that comes out as a Q post as factual. If you do, you need to stop coming here and stick to getting your information from CNN. You are not ready for prime time and neither are 90% of the viewers on here.

0
1

[–] 19017117? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

sounds good - just remember that your family is the most important thing, and political beliefs shouldn't have any role in that relationship

2
1

[–] 19015740? 2 points 1 point (+3|-2) ago 

Try some high-level arrests. That will galvanize the movement.

2
-2

[–] 19015920? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Try coming up with something else, faggot nigger hero, smollet'n up the place

1
0

[–] 19015974? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I doubt you could get a worldwide following with POTUS confimation in 3500 posts, but go for it!

1
-1

[–] 19016004? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

More @MolochHunter porn please

1
1

[–] 19016342? 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Can a shill post and not get only 2 up votes every time?

0
0

[–] 19017121? [S] ago 

There's an easy solution for low upvotes, its taken me about 3 years to think of, but I think I know

0
0

[–] 19022567? ago 

You’ve been shilling on this platform for over 3 years? Wow, didn’t even know about this dump till Q SENT ME LOL!

0
0

[–] 19017350? ago 

Does 'right' (correct) not bear some relationship to values?

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)