0
0

[–] 19061697? ago 

A male at 80 has less reproductive degradation than a female in early 30s.

Lying does not help your case.

0
0

[–] 19061701? ago 

Fertility declines rapidly for women after 30

Longevity has nothing to do with smelly old men fucking young women, 'anon'. Longevity is from older women have children later (as someone with a statistics interest you should already know this). The older a woman is when she has viable children means increasing longevity for that genetic line because subsequent generations (if they continue the trend) remain youthful longer. Your scenario where decrepity diseased old men fuck young women and use up their youth rather than giving them to virile young men with a future (MUH DICK NEED PUSSY ANON) does nothing for longevity at all.

0
0

[–] 19061704? ago 

It does. It has been almost single handedly responsible for increasing the life span of humans. Women cannot breed past 30-40 years of age depending on the woman. That just doesn't change. A man can breed at 90 is he is still alive strong attractive and successful. The best men often do breed into their 70s or 80s. Look at Mick Jagger. Since these children had a father that was able to outlive the majority of the population, they too have a genetic proclivity to outliving the majority of the population.

0
0

[–] 19061706? ago 

COMPLETELY FULL OF SHIT

GOD HELP US IF YOU ARE ACTUALLY A BIO OR STEM STUDENT

0
0

[–] 19061711? ago 

And when the woman is able to breed past 30-40, there is a high rate of deformity. This does not happen with older fathers. It has to do with simple biology. Sperm are continously regenerated while eggs are present from the beginning of life and just get older and older. It would take a much greater evolutionary shift to allow old women to have viable offspring.

0
0

[–] 19061715? ago 

This does not happen with older fathers.

BioChem major here anon. You cannot BULLSHIT ME like you can BULLSHIT others on /pol/. You are just lying.