0
2

[–] 18969629? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I’m busy watching the water!

1
1

[–] 18968066? 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Yes. Mid-terms are safe. TRUST THE PLAN

0
1

[–] 18967794? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Sessions is very deep state, i'd be SHOCKED if he turns out legit.

1
1

[–] 18967442? 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

mid-terms are safe

0
0

[–] 18967643? ago 

if they weren't we would have lost the Senate

0
1

[–] 18967369? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It's my understanding those are sealed proceedings, not indictments.

And yeah, I still trust Sessions and Huber until I see information that would make me think otherwise.

For me, the jury's still out on Wray; leaning towards not trusting him afte he apparently withheld relevant info.

0
1

[–] 18967665? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I enjoy reading comments of educated Q followers!

thanks for replying!

0
1

[–] 18967638? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Sealed proceedings - care to enlighten us more? First time I've heard it called that, what's the differences?

0
0

[–] 18971236? ago 

I honestly can't speak to the validity of the claim, either way, so take it with a grain of salt. It did make sense to me, though.

I remember reading a thread a few months ago (wish I could tell you exactly where, maybe abovesecret.com) in which there was a pretty good discussion about the whole "sealed indictments" topic.

Acording to a couple of the posters, who both were much more knowledgable of that particular database than I am, those numbers represent proceedings.

That said, if I understand correctly, you could actually end up having more than one indictment per proceeding but any given proceeding could also have zero indictments. Also, can't say I was ever able to determine if the total number is an anomaly, as far as sealed proceedings go.

So, if true, not really a "debunking", necessarily. Just a little shift in understanding of the data we're looking at.

If it is, in fact, accurate, I think it needs to be understood and spread so we aren't misstating facts.

0
0

[–] 18968951? ago 

Of course. Progress has been made.

1
0

[–] 18967953? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

As long as the "Players" link on Qmap continue to show them as "Patriots" then yes, I trust them.

0
0

[–] 18967652? ago 

Sessions = ??, Huber = ??, Wray = Wrat!!

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)