0
0

[–] 18853234? ago 

https://files.catbox.moe/zrue2o.png :

Deepfakes are coming. We’re not ready. - The Washington Post


This has been an automated message.

0
2

[–] 18853274? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Generate a dataset of deepfake generated faces with many different techniques, generate a dataset of known non-deepfaked faces, train another neural network to detect if face is generated or not.

Back in reality, corroborating evidence breaks down the 'Wuznt me I dindu ' bullshit.

0
0

[–] 18853282? ago 

1
-1

[–] 18853463? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

... and justice for all.

ps: fuck metalica also, bunch a no talent cry babies.

0
0

[–] 18853497? ago 

Sometimes the right thing to do is the just the right thing to do.

0
4

[–] 18853550? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

DeepFake's take a decent amount of time right now to render. Any decent quality one especially takes more time.

That said most images leave digital fingerprints of animation engines and the like. Forensics will be able to to detect what is real and what isnt for some time until the AI gets so cheap and perfected we genuinely won't know what the fuck is real and what isn't,

For now - this is a lame attempt to keep the fooled, fooled. "Don't worry that's not real." says the trustworthy news source. "Don't go looking any further. It's just fake. Go back to watching Ellen. Here's American Gladiators if that's not enough. Wow the Kardashians did WHAT?"

It won't permeate well and if what Q+ provides is a steady stream - there is no defense. They won't be able to label hours and hours of footage as false. And when Courts uphold their validity the DeepFake narrative goes immediately out tit's short-sided and desperate window.

0
1

[–] 18853661? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Analysis can easily ID faked videos. Easiest defense to that lying argument will be "Here's a copy, prove it".

PS Don't forget, even without the DeepFake defense, plenty of Liberals won't believe any evidence at all.

0
2

[–] 18853784? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Find the liberals who think Jussie Smollet is innocent. That is a pretty good litmus test for utter inability to process truth.

0
0

[–] 18853731? ago 

Hopefully there will be enough evidence to convict without any "video" scandal.

load more comments ▼ (8 remaining)