0
4

[–] 18853550? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

DeepFake's take a decent amount of time right now to render. Any decent quality one especially takes more time.

That said most images leave digital fingerprints of animation engines and the like. Forensics will be able to to detect what is real and what isnt for some time until the AI gets so cheap and perfected we genuinely won't know what the fuck is real and what isn't,

For now - this is a lame attempt to keep the fooled, fooled. "Don't worry that's not real." says the trustworthy news source. "Don't go looking any further. It's just fake. Go back to watching Ellen. Here's American Gladiators if that's not enough. Wow the Kardashians did WHAT?"

It won't permeate well and if what Q+ provides is a steady stream - there is no defense. They won't be able to label hours and hours of footage as false. And when Courts uphold their validity the DeepFake narrative goes immediately out tit's short-sided and desperate window.

0
3

[–] 18854719? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Psychological/ philosophical approach:

A deepfake is still a fake which is still a lie. A lie needs to be rushed.

Truth has eternity on its side.

It’s the same approach with FF’s:

Everyone calm down, foot on the brakes (slow down), look over the shoulder, signal lights, away from the fast lane. Best into a parking spot. Have a pee, stretch yourself, enjoy the landscape (get a complete picture), refocus, have a cup of tea (ask yourself qui bono/ who would benefit if that was true?) ... And stay away from the fast lane. Truth works at its own pace.

As already mentioned: The lie needs to be rushed in order to get people agitated in order to do stupid stuff.

A true incident can be researched and observed and dissected over and over. The fake will fall apart.

0
2

[–] 18853274? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Generate a dataset of deepfake generated faces with many different techniques, generate a dataset of known non-deepfaked faces, train another neural network to detect if face is generated or not.

Back in reality, corroborating evidence breaks down the 'Wuznt me I dindu ' bullshit.

0
1

[–] 18854455? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Obama's birth certificate is a perfect example of fake. Sophomoric attempt but still a fraud.

0
1

[–] 18854993? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

....and most people, outside our echo chamber of maybe 5%, think it's legit.

0
1

[–] 18855238? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I am a graphics dude. I grabbed it from the Whitehouse.gov website and opened it up. What a mess. It is in your face fraudulent.

0
1

[–] 18854223? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Chain of command? They have been held as evidence for a few years now, and DF crap is barely now even believable.... so I'd the courts release videos they got way before the DF tech was even invented....

0
0

[–] 18853805? ago 

I haven't seen one that looked real yet.

0
0

[–] 18855387? ago 

Why do you think they clamped down on the Christchurch video? Absolute maximum pressure to suppress it. Because it was fake.

0
0

[–] 18853755? ago 

I reckon the best way to combat the DeepFake defense in court would be to have corroborating evidence. This could be a witness, some documents, whatever.

Knowing this, my opinion on the DeepFake narrative is that it is primarily designed to persuade the public via the Fake News. I don't think that it will persuade a jury when sufficient corroborating evidence exists.

0
0

[–] 18854695? ago 

Video/audio recordings should NEVER be sufficient for a conviction. Now, as I’ve said, if MI has the actual evidence and can’t convict, I’m fine with some judge dredd action.

load more comments ▼ (8 remaining)