[–] 18849835? 0 points 14 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago
seems like a bunch of leftist npcs fear mongering that they someday wont be able to tear apart their offspring in a sick ritual murder. that and a few open minded philosophers explaining why their arguments are fundamentally retarded trying hard not to roll their eyes out the back of their heads.
[–] 18850549? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations. The first emphasize individualizing foundations (Harm/Care, Fairness/reciprocity), the second add to these also the binding foundations (ingroup/loyalty, authority/respect, purity/sanctity). (fbaum.unc.edu)
submitted 17 hours ago by concerned-citizen-01
bearorr1992 117 points 11 hours ago
My masters thesis is exploring MFT in relation to conservation - does framing a pro-conservation message in terms of moral rhetoric encourage more people to engage in conservation related behaviors?
Also - I’ve enjoyed following Pete Buttigieg’s presidential campaign because I’m almost positive he’s read Haidt’s “The Righteous Mind.” He’s a master of using traditionally conservative rhetoric while explaining his liberal stance on issues (e.g. abortion). It will be interesting to see how it pays off for him in the long run.
[–] 18849468? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
https://snew.notabug.io/r/philosophy/comments/btb37j/comment/eox3bip :
This has been an automated message.