0
0

[–] 18848660? ago 

>>13324153

If the economy ever collapses, they will all move somewhere else anyway.

With what money? And why do you assume they'll be accepted?

You think Whitey will get the same treatment as the muds? Hah, guess again my man.

Dunno

Well thats unfortunate. Maybe look into it and get back to us? That would be more constructive than simply stewing in desapir making comments like

but I am ready to just abandon everything, delete all bookmarks of /pol/ and other forums, delete my political discord, because of this shit.

ya know?

I can't bear this any longer.

You're going to have to my man. This is YOUR STRUGGLE.

This constant hoping that "maybe Gen Z will be based", "maybe we can have a right-wing revolution too in Germany at least for the people heavily browsing the Internet and then only get 6% for young people.

Maybe Gen Z WILL be based… When they're a bit older.

Why even bother being a moral conservative,

if you'd get attacked by other Right-Wingers for having a little bit of fun wtih a woman

What does that even mean? I've never seen that. If you're doing degenerate shit and trying to say its 'just fun', well… You kinda walked into that one, didn't ya?

and get called a Sexist for wanting to treat women as more than sexual objects?

That's something that might actually happen.

And the insane Incel Baggage we have to carry on our bags.

using capitalized incel unironically

I'm starting to this is a LARP again, or perhaps you've just got some personal issues you need to work out.

And despite all this we are just a tiny minority with no electoral power.

Yup. Just like the NSDAP in 1928, right?

Why is it that right-wing behavior like monogamy, being a provider, etc is still valued so highly, but talking about it is so demonized?

Demonized by (((whom))), exactly? The people who want to destroy you?

Yeah man, why WOULD they do that?

This all makes me sick to my stomach.

It should.

EXACTLY. We don't do anything!

There is nothing to be done at this time. I know that's not what you want to hear, but its the truth.

I say again:

So… How in the flaming fuck are you thinking you're going to appeal, politically or philosophically, and to a beneficial end, to demoralized, deracinated, atomized, alienated, selfish, money-grubbing, materialistic, pessimistic, defensive, frivolous people who do not - CAN not - even UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF DUTY as a meaningful factor in your society? Especially while undergoing an influx of foreigners and a weakening of spiritual learning (aka religion)?

Its not happening bro. Not a chance.

You can't build a castle out of soft clay, not one thats going to stand against anything at least.

You need stone, and stone can't simple be made so easily, not that I've seen at least.

The cycle of man:

Strong men create good times

Good times create weak men

Weak men create hard times

<You are here

Hard times create strong men

Its going to get worse before it gets better. You need to come to terms with that. If you can't, if you can't handle the struggle, then you do have the choice of walking away.

But thats a choice you have to make for yourself, and no amount of social signaling in despair will take that burden from your shoulders and yours alone.

0
0

[–] 18848664? ago 

There is nothing to be done at this time. I know that's not what you want to hear, but its the truth.

No it's not. get out and speak with the young and the old. Speak truth, talk problems and find way to unite them. Furthermore get as many as possible to become self sustaining, while shunning and actively protesting the beast system. Next show your colors by showing off your country flag everywhere (no political identity). You need unison, especially racial and most importantly segregate morally and stand up for each other at every opportunity. Instead of throwing slurs at others, use praise to boost yourselves. Also teach everyone to only move in large groups, build clans, financially help your own people in the neighborhood. Another thing…learn to chant. Sounds silly, but's it's one of the most efficient tools to unite mobs, terrify enemies, and confuse the shit out of anyone trying to discredit you. So whenever a jewish rat opens it's lying mouth to smear you, you get a group chant going that they can't understand. This also works great as means of protesting.

0
0

[–] 18848672? ago 

get out and speak with the young and the old. Speak truth, talk problems and find way to unite them.

You're going to hit myriad cognitive brick-walls due to propaganda and conditioning, especially in Western Europe. Further, that's simply not going to develope into what we need.

We need a shared vision. That is what actually creates a movement. Unfortunately, our current adult generations have been infected with apathy, selfishness, materialism and nihlism in large part, so, often enough, any expression of passion or genuine sentiment just comes off as "gay" or "try hard" or "LARP" or some shit, ya know?

It comes back to what I said before:

<So… How in the flaming fuck are you thinking you're going to appeal, politically or philosophically, and to a beneficial end, to demoralized, deracinated, atomized, alienated, selfish, money-grubbing, materialistic, pessimistic, defensive, frivolous people who do not - CAN not - even UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF DUTY as a meaningful factor in your society? Especially while undergoing an influx of foreigners and a weakening of spiritual learning (aka religion)?

<Its not happening bro. Not a chance.

<You can't build a castle out of soft clay, not one thats going to stand against anything at least.

<You need stone, and stone can't simple be made so easily, not that I've seen at least.

I guess I should say further that, from what Ive seen in my short time on this rock, making stone out of clay is a process which requires great hardship and struggle, of a sort we have not yet had to experience - and I don't believe we will see this transitional process unless such struggle and hardship is felt.

Furthermore get as many as possible to become self sustaining

That's just pipedreams IMHO given the current societal context. Self-sufficiency? Hah! The very concept is a joke, unless you've got an army behind you, because basically nobody else is self-sufficient, so guess whats going to happen the fucking instant there's a NEED to be self-sufficient? Being prepared is one thing and becoming some kind of stereotype of the doomsday prepper is another.

You need unison, especially racial

And this is where it falls apart, because of what I said above about racial solidarity/explicit racial advocacy being kept away from Europeans.

Instead of throwing slurs at others, use praise to boost yourselves.

This is just motivational speaker-tier "positive thinking" shit man… And do you see? Even I am subject to looking at what is probably your attempt at an expression of genuine desire for a more positive cohesive union amongst at, and seeing nothing but the hollow words of Tony Robbins shit. Still, the point stands IMHO.

Also teach everyone to only move in large groups, build clans, financially help your own people in the neighborhood.

All valid advice, but not meaningful political action.

Another thing…learn to chant. Sounds silly, but's it's one of the most efficient tools to unite mobs, terrify enemies, and confuse the shit out of anyone trying to discredit you. So whenever a jewish rat opens it's lying mouth to smear you, you get a group chant going that they can't understand. This also works great as means of protesting.

Okay. I'm not much one for protesting to be honest.

0
0

[–] 18848661? ago 

>>13324153

>>13324123

Look at how people treat Richard Spencer, who is an extremely intelligent guy with profund insights on the political Zeitgeist.

He is a much better Intellectual than a Leader for Protests.

Is he? I don't think so.

I don't see him as an ally at all, because of exactly what I said to you before about zionists.

I had my suspicions for a very long time, but I kept an open mind. Then I saw this.

<Vid related

And all that fell away.

Anyone who telling you "islam is the real problem, not the zionist jews" is not ally - he's compromised, or he was never an ally at all.

I really like his "Leftists are sorta right in the wrong way and for the wrong reasons" takes.

I always found him rather less than convincing and a bit of a blow hard to be honest.

I'm more partial to Kais Murros as far as commentary goes, but Spencer has an occasional gem of insight… A shame he's ruined any faith I can or will have in him by shilling for zionism.

Literally happened with Spencer. People attack him just because he says that Israel might be a good example on how to do things. People get triggered over this simple objective compliments.

Vid related is far more than what you imply my man.

If you don't see that, well… Guess I'm back to calling you an emotionally-compromised idiot or a subversive LARPer, because I can't see any other way you could view

<vid related

and come to the conclusion that such was merely a claim of "israel being a good example" or a "simple objective compliment". This is the man saying "zionist jews are not our existential enemies like muzzies are u guiz!" and that is the objective opposition, its having a fight with your enemies' sword instead of the enemy himself, and nobody who pushes such a narrative line can be trusted. Especially not one with so many ties to zionist jewry, going all the way back to his ((('mentor'))).

0
0

[–] 18849334? ago 

0
0

[–] 18848667? ago 

There's other issues with Spencer as well, mind you, but they are somewhat "complex" themselves in terms of how people rationalize narrative positions presented by "intellectuals" and the like.

I understand how people will argue that "holocaust denial is not beneficial to the movement!" or the like, but… If you're not going to deny, you should simply maintain a neutral/silent position. Pushing the jewish narrative on this front is explicitly shooting yourself in the foot, if you're attempting to pursue explicit White advocacy, because jews view explicit White advocacy as a threat, they have established a strong holohoax-based narrative opposing explicit White advocacy and have used it to condition/propagandize, with several major organizations backing that effort.

As such, while it may be true that holohoax denial has bad optical traits, its also strategically a dead-end to embrace that narrative which is most-commonly employed to demonize the very concept of explicit White advocacy regardless of expressed intent on behalf of the advocate in question.

0
0

[–] 18848659? ago 

No, I don't. Do you?

Yes, extremely so.

Does all of Germany have to be a forest or be out of concrete?

It can't be both.

You're missing the rape squads for the trees.

"You can't have X, because of demographic displacement."

FTFY, and yes. That's simply a fact. You can't have X, because demographic displacement.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9AGx2q_F_0

Looks interesting, but I'm not going to devote 20 minutes right now, I'm sure you understand.

Point being, if you look at the context of that video, and of coverage of that guy, you'll see that he is held up as an exception case, because he, like myself, are a rarity in these contexts.

I don't suppose you would know anything about his stances BEYOND this context? That's really the important bit, because the point I was making mentioning such was that most "Green" parties and shit, let alone outright leftist orgs, don't espouse this position and attack this position.

Doing a brief scrape on his name and certain keywords, I already found instances of him being attacked for his commentary on "the death of environmentalism" and pro-nuclear stance by people shilling for mudmen invaders and big corporate, most of them leftist.

I have no idea

Then that's not very helpful, is it?

and I want to kill myself.

Why? Wait, what am I saying? I know why. But you can't, because like dawn light in black sown, all darkness will be overthrown. I know its hard to believe now, but its the truth.

We won't ever achieve anything here with just right-wing populism.

Do… Do you still think I'm DEFENDING "right-wing" populism? I want you to take a moment and go back to reading what I've said and see if you still think thats the case.

A /pol/ candidate would be fucking retarded, because he had to speak "honestly" about the j question, because he couldn't bear it to have a single anon call him a Zionist.

Patrick Little was your /pol/ candidate.

Yes, but you aren't listening to my whole narrative, which is that you HAVE TO DO THAT, and its a matter of context as to whether or not it will work. Why did it work for Hitler and not Patrick Little? Think on that and get back to me.

Well maybe we need to become a minority to deal with them.

I don't think that's the case.

It sure as fuck doesn't bother people right now.

I think it does, given the scene in the general European elections. It may not be bothering THE YOUTH, but, I've already talked about why thats not a good metric.

0
0

[–] 18848673? ago 

Why? Wait, what am I saying? I know why. But you can't, because like dawn light in black sown, all darkness will be overthrown. I know its hard to believe now, but its the truth.

Then why don't young people fucking vote Right-Wing?

I thought i was part of an internet revolution. I thought young people would find to us, because of memes. Be right-wing and a Nationalist, because it's cool.

But I guess I am just inside an echo-chamber. 40% non-german births. Where is my right-wing internet evolution, anon?

You promised.

Think on that and get back to me.

Because the currency of Germany was Zimbabwe-tier and the economy wasn't much better.

>>13324158

I am talking about the immigrants, not the native Europeans.

That's something that might actually happen.

This is what literally happens.

Feminsits want to be protected and treated respectfully, but that can only come from right-wing, traditional men.

They want to be seen as more than just sexual objects, but that again .. comes from right-wing traditionalism, where being a mother and housewife was respected.

It's so shizo. If you do what they say, you'd strip everything from them and make them just into more stupid and weaker versions of men that you want to fuck. It's like a shit test.. For civilization.

If I think about stuff like this, I don't want to abandon it all, but at the same time it all seems to hopeless again.

I'm starting to this is a LARP again, or perhaps you've just got some personal issues you need to work out.

If you don't see how the Incel and women-hating crowd has attached themselves to the Right-Wing, you need to wake up or you are one of them.

Yup. Just like the NSDAP in 1928, right?

Anon … back then we had a massive demographic of disgruntled soldiers, traditional women and a lot of right-wing men, economic collapse and a 100% white ethnostate … before Hitler even took power.

Its going to get worse before it gets better. You need to come to terms with that.

I just legit thought I was part of right-wing internet revolution and wasn't stuck inside an echochamber of a tiny radical minority.

>>13324167

What Richard said is completly correct. I try to translate it:

Islam = obvious enemy everyone can plainly see

Jewish Question = very complex, hidden Problem that most people have trouble seeing and understanding

Anyone who telling you "islam is the real problem, not the zionist jews" is not ally - he's compromised, or he was never an ally at all.

He never said that "Islam is the real problem". He said Islam is an obvious enemy . He often says that Islam is the "Black Flag raised against the White Race" and that is true. It's a very obvious civilization clash.

Jews on the other hand, you can't just declare war on Jews like you can declare war on ISIS. It's a completly different problem that probably most people will never comprehend in its entirety.

and nobody who pushes such a narrative line can be trusted. Especially not one with so many ties to zionist jewry, going all the way back to his ((('mentor')))

He isn't pushing a narrative. This is an intellectual discussion. Not rabble rousing.

>>13324169

everyone that doesn't talk about killing kikes is a shill

Calling Richard Spencer a shill is honestly one of the things that makes me hate this part of the right-wing so much sometimes.

>>13324204

You don't know from what perspective he is saying these things. He doesn't come from a "conservative" standpoint that says "We aren't responsible for Slavery, because it wasn't us that did it". He agrees with the Left that White People represent a history, where as Conservatives deny that History.

It's a kinda unique perspective of the Alt/New/dissident Right. He basically says to just take ownership of ALL of our history, good and bad.

0
0

[–] 18849050? ago 

>>13324301

He isn't pushing a narrative.

He definitely is, whether or not you agree with that narrative is the question.

This is an intellectual discussion. Not rabble rousing.

Its a discussion, wherein a given party is being querried and presenting their narrative positions on various topics - in this case, a man who claims his 'mentor' was a zionist jewish man (Paul Gottfried) and who is now saying that "zionism is not an enemy in the context of controlling media narratives", claiming "the jewish question is just so complex" and promoting the narrative of the holohoax (whether for optics or not, pretty irrelevant).

You don't know from what perspective he is saying these things.

I do though.

He doesn't come from a "conservative" standpoint that says "We aren't responsible for Slavery, because it wasn't us that did it".

He should.

He agrees with the Left that White People represent a history, where as Conservatives deny that History.

No, no, no. "Conservatives" don't deny that history at all, they embrace it and cuck on it. Nationalists, however, point out that much of the 'history' presented IS IN FACT A LIE. And those lies form the narrative foundation which acts to inhibit such activies as explicit White advocacy. As such, they MUST BE CONFRONTED (as opposed to 'embraced' or 'owned') because to internalize these narratives is to legitimize and solidify EVEN FURTHER the foundations which act to inhibit what is necessary to serve a truly Nationalistic stance.

It's a kinda unique perspective of the Alt/New/dissident Right.

Yes, its very cucky. Its EXTREMELY cucky, and almost-certainly for optics - which basically everyone with half a brain sees through immediately. If its NOT for optics, also a possibility and a strong point of suspicion because of his stance on zionism and associations therewith, then he's trying to poison his own people with a weak cucky narrative which will only act to inhibit.

He basically says to just take ownership of ALL of our history, good and bad.

Taking ownership of a false history which is inherently designed and aimed to discredit your very perpetuation as a biologic and cultural clade, consciously and purposefully internalizing such a thing, is the paramount of dysgenic behaviors.

0
0

[–] 18849046? ago 

Then why don't young people fucking vote Right-Wing?

Same reason they weren't by all indications in 1928. Again, what is "young" in this context again?

I thought i was part of an internet revolution. I thought young people would find to us, because of memes. Be right-wing and a Nationalist, because it's cool.

Yeah, you're fucking stupid by the sound of it my man. That's retarded.

But I guess I am just inside an echo-chamber. 40% non-german births. Where is my right-wing internet evolution, anon? You promised.

Pic related bud.

Because the currency of Germany was Zimbabwe-tier and the economy wasn't much better.

Exactly. How'd it get that way? And who did that?

And what do you think 40% non-german births is going to do if maintained for any length of time? And who did THAT?

See where I'm going with this?

I am talking about the immigrants, not the native Europeans.

Oh, well then… Let them? That would be a good thing, no?

This is what literally happens. Feminsits want to be

Feminists are retarded. Women are retarded. That's why Hitler banned them from many political positions, remember?

It's so shizo. If you do what they say, you'd strip everything from them and make them just into more stupid and weaker versions of men that you want to fuck. It's like a shit test.. For civilization.

Yes, that's exactly what it is. Women are retarded. And when they get too much power, retarded things happen. And the consequences of that… Well, remember the

<You are here

bit? Yeah.

0
0

[–] 18848677? ago 

Richard Spencer was mentored by a Jew and glows in the dark.

He was signal boosted by mainstream media just like other aut kike figures back during 2015 - 2017.

We need another Hitler or equivalent, and before then we probably need a major crisis.

Supporting controlled opposition figures poisons this movement.

But it seems like the time for National Socialism has come again, with the internet acting like the modern version of radio during the 1920s and 1930s, and mass disillusion with society similar to what happened during that era.

If the economy collapses, the US goes to war with Iran, or something else happens to further destabilize society, it will be a massive opportunity.

Right now it's 1919 - 1920.

0
0

[–] 18848651? ago 

you can't have X, because of muslims

Except this is literally true you subversive shill.

Muslims don't care about the environment, their IQs are too low.

Survival of the environment is secondary to survival of our race, if our race does not survive the environment won't either.

0
0

[–] 18848653? ago 

Yeah, I bet Farage is redpilled and based, right? Totally didn't gatekeep the anti-immigration attitude of Brits.

Brits are the only major power of Europe that don't have an anti-immigration party.

0
0

[–] 18848654? ago 

I didn't say anything about Farage or Britain.

You are here to subvert and distract, this was made obvious because you defended Richard Spencer.

You're probably from TRS. I hope your servers get smashed, sodomite.