0
1

[–] DarkStillWater 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I never eat at Subway. EVER. They should run these tests at Arbys. I am certain they would find a disgustingly toxic mix of shit.

1
2

[–] Wowbagger 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

While I agree that Subway serves subpar chicken that's infused with soy I'd like to point out a flaw in this arbitrary test. Testing for DNA concentrations is not the same as testing the material itself and so they've drawn the wrong conclusion if they say half the "chicken" itself is soy. The issue here is that soy concentrate is used as a preservative for cheap chicken like what Subway serves and plant cells, in general, hold much more DNA than animal cells. In other words, of course if you measure the DNA you're going to find much more soy than chicken since it's literally sprayed with a concentrate of plant cells. This doesn't mean the meat itself is more soy than chicken. It's still terrible for you compared to eating a fresh chicken breast but it's not half soy.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] Wowbagger ago 

Perhaps the people who did the test do but a lot of people read this article and others derived from it and come away with the impression that the meat itself is literally 50%+ soy. I don't want my fellow goats to be misinformed. It's an important distinction. Eating a sandwich with this chicken, although it's definitely soy-ish and not ideal for you is not equivalent to, say- eating an equivalent volume of edamame when it comes to detrimental effects of soy. Come to think of it though, I'd sooner have the edamame with some giant salt grains on it over eating that "bread" and "meat".

0
0

[–] slowcrash101 ago 

They all do, textured soy filler.

1
-1

[–] Crayonall9t 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Fear of soy is a right wing psyop, and it is going really well.

0
0

[–] Firevine ago 

Will Mahood, a loyal customer who considered Subway chicken sandwiches a lunchtime staple, was alarmed by the findings. To Mahood, messages from fast food companies can make it sound like "you're taking it straight from a farm and it's just a fresh piece of meat."

That makes me wonder if that guy has ever eaten real food. Subway "chicken" clearly isn't on the up and up.

1
1

[–] dowegberts 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Should have ran it on Mc Chicken nuggets, them things are nasty....

0
2

[–] Calculations 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

No offense but subway is bottom of the barrel dog shit trash food. Why do people expect to pay minimal pricing for anything but pure dog shit.

0
0

[–] nelgar31 ago 

I keep trying to get boat to watch dr berg on jootube but I think the name puts people off

load more comments ▼ (9 remaining)