[–] BlaQPatriot ago
Oh fuck yes!!!!! I was hoping it wouldn't get mucked up. Bad enough this is a lib stronghold, they tried to make it permanent. MAGA!
[–] Araket 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Yeah well, states such as mine just decided to legislate this problem away with popular vote laws and striking Trump from the ballot. I'm still wondering if they can actually do the former, I mean that's so low as to seem illegal. Either way people such as myself have no say and are completely unrepresented. Not that it really makes a huge difference, they were giving all electoral votes to the popular state winner before, which our big cities just gave to the dems anyways. Just a new dirty tactic.
[–] fancypants211 ago
know I am in CT. almost as bad as cali here. It pisses me off they unilaterally do shit like this. Big changes to the constitution should be voted on by the states. none of this is in our best interests. assholes. i want to see them dead, screw arrested i want all of us to get a whip and peel away a few layers of flesh. we all should get ten whips each. till they die.
[–] Trousersnake1488 ago
Oy vey, what's good for Americans is good for Israel. Just as George washington jntended
[–] qanon1776 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
"Electoral districts are typically redrawn once a decade after the U.S. census to reflect population changes. In many states, the party in power controls the map-making".
Let's get rid of the "in many states" and make a bi partisan across the board policy based only on census of US citizens.
[–] Khemyst ago
some states still have a way to go. In california, years ago, it was put on the ballot to have the top two vote getters in primaries face off against each other instead of the top winner in each party. This essentially guaranties that each election will basically be two Democrats facing each other after the primaries are done! That is how and why a lot of seats changed from red to blue in 2018....