[–] markrod420 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
They will not allow this by one means or another.
[–] cantaloupe6 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Sad for him, no more shooting out people's eyes.
[–] peacegnome 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
By "far-right" they really mean center-left.
[–] Civil_Warrior 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Normal citizens are labeled vile racist far right extremists simply for having common sense and proper values.
[–] 4841400209 ago
Article says support has risen for Le Pen and Macron. Highly doubtful after the Yellow Vest movement.
[–] webster_warrior 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
We aren't the only ones with biased news. Reuters refers to Le Pen as "far-right," but would never refer to Macron as "far left" which he is. They either call him progressive or neglect to label him. News is no longer news.
[–] DrShitlord 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Macron isn't far left. He's whatever his puppeteers want him to be. It just happens to be "left" these days. If he had had better chances at becoming president by being "right", he'd have gone for that.
[–] webster_warrior 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Thanks, I didn't know that. My point is, any position the liberals do not like is labeled in the press
as far right. It is journalistic bias. One problem, is that gradually being far right for real will be considered OK. Isn't that a danger of irresponsible journalism?
[–] Civil_Warrior 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Progressive. Proof that new does not mean better.