[–] [deleted] 0 points 25 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago
[–] no-hurry-no-pause 2 points 10 points 12 points (+12|-2) ago (edited ago)
It isnt really popular on voat because voats talked themselves into the idea that jews and only jews invented socialism.
In reality, socialism naturally arises where low-earners, i.e. the lazy, dumb, high time preference side of inequality is given a vote. The first thing they always do is taxing high-earners and redistributing their wealth.
The reason socialists passionately hate families is because high-earners pass wealth on to their children and if families are strong and healthy, children end up richer then their already rich parents due to interest compounding over decades or centuries a family can exist.
Socialism isnt what happens when your society is infected by jews, socialism is what happens when your society is infected by democracy.
Also women arent nation wreckers. They do not have the power to do that on their own.
Whoever gives women a vote is the nation wrecker.
[–] Zaqwert 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago (edited ago)
Men were shaped by tens of millions of years of evolution to be leaders of tribes, nations, and society. Women are simply not properly equipped to make decisions on a societal scale. They were wired by evolution to excel in the micro-environment of their own family and children.
[–] burnthegoyimhaters 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Every woman I meet these days comes at me wide eyed and empowered in their woeful ignorance.
[–] NosebergShekelman 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago (edited ago)
Feminism is a jewish construct. We've implemented it in every country we've ever set up shop in. We even had cavewomen dragging cavemen into the cave by THEIR hair and sticking their finger up their butt
[–] HesitantUnsureness 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
This all seems very similar to what we have today with feminism... and who created and is pushing for feminism today? Are they all the women, or are they something else?
https://files.catbox.moe/ujluh8.jpg
Do not start blaming women for men's weakness. Who after all gave women the power to destroy nations? ... It was weak men. If you behave like a men then your woman will have no need to take charge, take matters into her own hands, or get involved in politics. She does not want to conquer ... she wants to be conquered ... by a man.
[–] lettersofmarque 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
How long after this play was written was the fall of Athens? The play is again current. Start the doomsday clock.
[–] Pwning4Ever 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The pension/SocialSecurity time bomb is viewed from the horizon. The more feminine nations like the Europeans will have it a bit sooner than we do. I think we got about 15-25 more years until the house of cards comes crashing down. Give women the right to vote, not even a hundred years later, society collapses.
[–] Splooge 1 point 32 points 33 points (+33|-1) ago (edited ago)
A typical woman's sole goal in life is to find a provider (or providers) with minimal investment or commitment. At their core they know that they are sexual objects competing with other sexual objects who may or may not be in a league above their own, therefore the majority will always seek to lower the bar for acceptance (or equalize it as much as possible).
Therefore, it is always in the typical woman's best interest to establish a society in which women are cared for with no obligation or expectation for return or, better yet, effort. This is why societies in which women rule or have a controlling interest will devolve into welfare states that promote degeneracy.
The ideal societal outcome for women as a whole is one in which men are denigrated and expected to be subservient to women. They provide blindly via their tax dollars while women have no obligation to look good (shaved-head fat feminists), raise children or pro-create (rampant human abortion).
The tranny faggot movement is also part of the typical feminist agenda because it dilutes competition for providers. After all, if you live in a city full of some 7's and 9's, they will get your attention, not the 6's and unders. However, if you live in a city with nothing but tranny faggots to choose from, the idea is that you'll settle for even a 3 or 4 because hey, at least it's not a tranny faggot.
A common refrain about women is that they are just like children and should be treated as such. One easy way to prove this about any given female is to compare their political views and desires to a child's. Doing so will reveal striking similarities. They are usually wildly naive and idealistic, devoid of any logic or consideration for logistical challenges, such as "everyone should be equal and treated the same" or "if everyone had more money, then X would be better."
Another way to see this mentality is by comparing women's entertainment to men's. Yes, it's all kike propaganda, but note the way it's received. Most men will watch The Punisher or an Avengers movie and think "man that's cool, I wish I could be like X character." They aspire to emulate traits or lifestyles they observe, both of which require work and self-improvement.
In contrast, a woman consumes media by replacing favorable characters with herself. You never see men saying "dude I'm sooo Peter Parker!" or "Yassss, I'm totes Bruce Wayne!" but you do see women saying "I'm a Disney princess!!" and "That character is soooo me!" regardless of actual similarities. This is why Fifty Shades of Grey and Twilight was so well-received; in both cases, a main female character is described in vague terms, completely unspecial in every way and yet has rich, powerful handsome men at her beck and call for no reason other than she exists.
[–] Pwning4Ever 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
by creating a more capitalistic free market society, women simply cannot compete with men and their drive. So they can just latch onto a guy that is really good and what not. But if they are fat and can't? Well, vote for the state, this is evolutionary backwards. Instead of allowing the strongest to survive, we are allowing everyone to procreate.
[–] NoRoyalty 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
"A common refrain about women is that they are just like children and should be treated as such. One easy way to prove this about any given female is to compare their political views and desires to a child's. Doing so will reveal striking similarities. They are usually wildly naive and idealistic, devoid of any logic or consideration for logistical challenges, such as "everyone should be equal and treated the same" or "if everyone had more money, then X would be better."
First, the argument thst all women think like children is inaccurate. Just look at some of the fine female minds on the right. Brigitte Gabriel, Candace Owens etc.
Having said that, I listened to a conversation on a radio station between a man and woman on the subject of paid maternity leave. I had never listened to these two co-hosts so I was trying to figure out what their positions were and here is how it went: it was obvious they were friends. Man: I believe in some sort of support for women workers who have just had a child, but for a small business owner such as myself, how would that work in terms of my bottom line?
Woman: well as a new mother that is not my concern or my problem. You would just have to build my needs into your business model.
Wow. Totally child-like. But this is the result of the death of logic in educational systems. I believe logic can be taught. Just as I believe potential lawmakers reveal very early their general intelligence level and whether or not they process problems with logic.
[–] sniglom 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Candace Owens is a fake. Take a look at her history and the crazy doxxing website "SocialAutopsy.com" that she used to run. Can you imagine that the site was still active, while she was a "republican" and being interviewed by Alex Jones? Don't fool yourself.
[–] JastheMace ago
Also, this is also social manipulation by TPTB. The big huge companies can already afford to do this but many don't, giving the women the issue to bitch about. They know the smaller companies can't afford it so making it a law forces small businesses to comply hurting them even leading to closures and buy outs. They can create larger monopolies by using government as a tool to hurt smaller competitors. Another attack on the middle class, bottom up top down.
[–] Dirty_Money [S] ago
I would argue that the "lazy gene" has everything to do with child rearing.
The entire biological drive of women is to ensure the survival of their children.
The attention even one toddler requires throughout a day is astounding. They are suicidal little shits.
Hence, a partner who can go out and garner all needed provisions automatically becomes desirable.
Those who can provide several times over absolutely insure offspring survival. Hence, even the ugliest rich guy has women hanging off of him.
Women will lie, cheat, and steal to gain reproductive advantage.
When women perceive that society is failing this basic nesting urge in any way, they will try to take over the controls of society, so that "all children" (i.e. their own), are guatanteed survival.
[–] Intrixina 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Well said.
I slightly disagree with you when you say that women think politically like a child, because I'm not one to think like that. However, I know I am an outlier. I would say that the vast majority do precisely that though, hence the "slightly".
[–] Splooge 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
>slightly disagree
>vast majority do precisely that
Pick one