0
0

[–] no-hurry-no-pause ago  (edited ago)

CONFEDERATE Statue Erected by DEMOCRATS

What do you want to say? That "democrats are the real racists"?

White People Who Were NEVER Nazis

Obviously they should have been. The republicans are the real cucks.

0
0

[–] pby1000 ago 

The Albert Pike statue?

0
1

[–] CaucasianSlavery 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

*never slave owners, possibly slaves or destitute for generations, while their children were sold into debt slavery by the usury tricks of the super rich and also, unfortunately, not nazis.

0
1

[–] derram 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

0
6

[–] oldgoatnew 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I'd rather people be pro Trump than an SJW, but there is still far to go after that. Ultimately Trump is a zionist, but he has done some great things for our country. This idea that Confederates were all Democrats is not based on reality nor is the belief that somehow the Confederates were the bad guys.

1
-1

[–] Civil_Warrior 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Who was abe lincoln and what party did he represent again?

YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT.

1
7

[–] TheGrandMaster 1 point 7 points (+8|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Abraham Lincoln offered the Confederate states an amendment that would protect slavery. It's a complete fallacy that this was a war over slaves.

Each state had it's own sovereignty and power until Abraham Lincoln (Zionist) was looking to unite all the states under a strict federal government. The Confederate states wanted to keep state powers and tyrant Lincoln wanted to take away those rights.

It all makes sense when you realize that reconstruction after the civil war was largely to set up a strong federal government and to set the stage for central banks to move in.

Just 20 years after reconstruction we got the federal reserve under Woodrow Wilson (tyrant).

2
-2

[–] StrangeThingsAfoot 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago  (edited ago)

It's a complete fallacy that this was a war over slaves.

It actually was. Declaration of secession of the southern states

In the present case, that fact is established with certainty. We assert that fourteen of the States have deliberately refused, for years past, to fulfill their constitutional obligations, and we refer to their own Statutes for the proof.

The Constitution of the United States, in its fourth Article, provides as follows: "No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due."

This stipulation was so material to the compact, that without it that compact would not have been made. The greater number of the contracting parties held slaves, and they had previously evinced their estimate of the value of such a stipulation by making it a condition in the Ordinance for the government of the territory ceded by Virginia, which now composes the States north of the Ohio River.

The same article of the Constitution stipulates also for rendition by the several States of fugitives from justice from the other States.

The General Government, as the common agent, passed laws to carry into effect these stipulations of the States. For many years these laws were executed. But an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery, has led to a disregard of their obligations, and the laws of the General Government have ceased to effect the objects of the Constitution. The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa, have enacted laws which either nullify the Acts of Congress or render useless any attempt to execute them. In many of these States the fugitive is discharged from service or labor claimed, and in none of them has the State Government complied with the stipulation made in the Constitution. The State of New Jersey, at an early day, passed a law in conformity with her constitutional obligation; but the current of anti-slavery feeling has led her more recently to enact laws which render inoperative the remedies provided by her own law and by the laws of Congress. In the State of New York even the right of transit for a slave has been denied by her tribunals; and the States of Ohio and Iowa have refused to surrender to justice fugitives charged with murder, and with inciting servile insurrection in the State of Virginia. Thus the constituted compact has been deliberately broken and disregarded by the non-slaveholding States, and the consequence follows that South Carolina is released from her obligation.

This tactic of ignoring all evidence that doesn't fit the narrative and turning everything into "us vs them" is unbecoming of us. White people didn't get this far by creating echo chambers and denying reality; we got this far by being willing to accept all evidence, even that which does not suit our immediate interests. The war was very much a war over slavery.

0
4

[–] oldgoatnew 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Nice concise explanation. Our true history is laced with so many lies that most people don't have the willpower or brainpower to unravel it all, they just scoop it up and swallow. Yum, herd mentality so tasty.