0
0

[–] FreeinTX ago 

Because DDOSing a website just doesn't do any actual damage.

0
0

[–] 18637163? ago 

What is your favorite 'And One' song?

0
0

[–] 18637187? ago 

Moron will say Deutschmaschine due to his being an utter fraud throughout 'his' entire life.

0
0

[–] T1tus ago 

The hack the crippled BlackBerry for almost a week, was a targeted hack to get people to switch to Cabal controlled Apple

0
2

[–] hugellama 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Because a lot of the “cyber” attacks are companies covering their ass for selling the data illegally or don’t encrypt any use data.

0
1

[–] 18636451? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Good hackers are the same as good hunters.

0
1

[–] albatrosv15 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

  1. "Hackers" usually get into legal work.
  2. Too many distractions due to so many possibilities.
  3. Devastation usually sows greater security. It's much better just to gather information and stay low.
  4. The masses of pajeets and other non-whites are too stupid to be beyond script kiddies. Usually, statistically.

0
1

[–] 18642894? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Devastation usually sows greater security

This equation is like the wealth equation. If you go to prison for stealing, you didn't steal enough. How many bankers went to jail over the financial crisis and the massive fraud conducted with regard to mortgage bundling? The answer is close to 1.

So the counterintuitive fact of the matter is devastation may sow a proactive response of hardening and scrutiny, but often it does not. The reasons for this range from system administrators misrepresenting the issue to their managers, to managers and board members misrepresenting the issue to their customers, or simply down to the fact that the vast majority of sysadmins are basically trained monkeys.

The reason companies like Crowdstrike exist (almost used existed but getting ahead of myself by a few weeks) is to help corporations cover up this sort of thing in order to indemnify those corporations from culpability due to their negligence and/or dishonesty.

0
0

[–] 18636667? ago 

Devastation usually sows greater security

For both those who saw it coming and those complicit.

0
1

[–] 18636459? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

simplistic black hat thinking is devised by people without the intellectual capacity to operate a workstation, though through social engineering and 'Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing' tropes can dominate an industry throughout an administration.

0
0

[–] albatrosv15 ago  (edited ago)

simplistic black hat thinking is devised by people without the intellectual capacity to operate a workstation

Could you please elaborate on that? Are you saying that black hats are simplistic? In what way?