0
1

[–] One-Way_Bus 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

(((Someone))) is getting an insane golden parachute payout that no one in the (((SEC)) will question. I remember when MSN tried to partner with their crap "news" a couple decades ago. They produce nothing of value and never will.

0
1

[–] sane [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

THEY HAD A $107 million IPO!?! Jeeebus I forgot that. What a fiasco! :

https://www.politico.com/media/story/2016/05/the-fall-of-saloncom-004551

Anyway, golden parachutes are ONLY if firing a person, not quitting or going bankrupt, UNLESS less than 2 years (typically 90 days) of earnest compensation from all causes.

So no golden parachute to question.

0
1

[–] One-Way_Bus 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Maybe (((they))) did the looting for decades and still get to walk away with the bank.

I didn't realize that got a massive IPO payout. I mean, how does any (((bank))) assess the value of their fake internet news stock?

I need to find a scam like this.

0
1

[–] Wiserman 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

All assets have to be sold and salon.com. the .com name will probably later be turned into a profitable porn site, right? Anything that it takes to be profitable. Just kidding. Maybe a communist site.

0
1

[–] beece 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Already posted, but worth laughing at again:-) https://voat.co/v/news/3220763 Makes you wonder if Obama was really paying taxpayer $ratch to some of these leftist rags and the "program" ended. I suspect so.

0
1

[–] sane [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

DONT USE ARCHIVERS on non-ad laden sites! (I see no ads, none on my (the OP) link.

That redundant submission is the problem of archive sites; they diminish ability to let voat know if a subverse such as v/News already got a link submission hours earlier.

The second problem with archivers is typically (but not that one) to force people to enable javascript!

My link submission (the OP) renders perfectly fine and readable, and re-actively dynamically resizeable WITH JAVASCRIPT FORCED OFF for that site for safety, but with Javascript off, the top of that page on archive.fo is unreadable (90% of the headline of the article is covered by a frozen popup ad). Turn off javascript and verify yourself.

Third problem, Other than insecurity of running javascript, third party sites could harvest voat IPs with custom unique archive links.

Fourth problem, its a single point of failure.

FIFTH PROBLEM, I cannot resize my web browser window on https://archive.fo/c52dg (archive.fi) and have it reflow text, but the CSS and HTML with javascript OFF on the original link that I used works fine.

There are countless problems to never use a goddamned archiver EXCEPT as a bot within the post thread for posterity.

0
0

[–] DIY-Guy ago  (edited ago)

.com bubble to this now? I don't think it's due to "go woke go broke!!" or any of that. I think people are more or so catching on to all the gibberish / junk and/or etc that many of these sites pedal. I don't know on this one personally as Salon is something you probably read in the Salon probably or something like that or what it was "intended" to be, but failed nonetheless to say the least. Always thought that was clever as the site name, but never read the site personally.

I think this is the bubble bursting of gibberish / low grade / military grade / junk news and/or bad information (just lies). Stuff they've been pedaling for years and now the bubble is bursting.

0
0

[–] Turnagain ago  (edited ago)

Peddle. Pedal is foot operated. (courtesy of a grammar Nazi)

0
0

[–] Darwinxmachina ago 

I remember salon advocating pedophilia twenty years ago and being horrified at their flagrant hubris.

0
1

[–] 18634398? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Soros money incoming

0
1

[–] shiftyposter 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Remember all the pro pedo articles salon wrote? Good riddance.