0
1

[–] One-Way_Bus 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

(((Someone))) is getting an insane golden parachute payout that no one in the (((SEC)) will question. I remember when MSN tried to partner with their crap "news" a couple decades ago. They produce nothing of value and never will.

0
1

[–] sane [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

THEY HAD A $107 million IPO!?! Jeeebus I forgot that. What a fiasco! :

https://www.politico.com/media/story/2016/05/the-fall-of-saloncom-004551

Anyway, golden parachutes are ONLY if firing a person, not quitting or going bankrupt, UNLESS less than 2 years (typically 90 days) of earnest compensation from all causes.

So no golden parachute to question.

0
1

[–] One-Way_Bus 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Maybe (((they))) did the looting for decades and still get to walk away with the bank.

I didn't realize that got a massive IPO payout. I mean, how does any (((bank))) assess the value of their fake internet news stock?

I need to find a scam like this.

0
1

[–] ardvarcus 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

One of the Big Jews will save it, at a discount. They aren't going to allow such a useful propaganda platform to disappear.

0
1

[–] GizaDog 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Salon Shouldn’t Have Unpublished Its Article by a Pedophile Author

https://www.thecut.com/2017/02/salon-shouldnt-have-unpublished-its-pedophilia-article.html

0
1

[–] vastrightwing 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I'll turn the light off.

0
2

[–] NosebergShekelman 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

oy vey we must use goytard taxpayer money to bail them out!! Shaloms™✡️

0
1

[–] One-Way_Bus 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It's what they want sadly. Likely may happen.

0
7

[–] 18628936? 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

This is how they protect their money from lawsuits and the upcoming Covington Kid annihilation.

They continue to say whatever they want and now a new ownership structure isolates them further from any legal repercussion.

That is all this is.

1
0

[–] One-Way_Bus 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

You're right. The (((SEC))) will protect them.

0
2

[–] Sharipie 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

If they seriously were selling it there's no way they would settle for $5M. That amount is so low, it might as well have been zero dollars.

0
2

[–] sane [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You are wise. Interesting. I bet they too were served papers, or on the cusp. The buyer needs to be informed of all pending litigation by law, else the deal is nullified though.

0
1

[–] Sharipie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

For that price, the buyer must be somebody who isn't really buying it so much as helping salon evade the lawsuits.

0
4

[–] 18629025? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

From Salon:

Could President Trump, Justice Clarence Thomas and a Kentucky teenager make it harder for liberals to criticize conservatives by redefining what constitutes defamation in the United States? Nick Sandmann appears determined to do that.

Can anyone guess what I changed in this quote? It is obvious if you consider Salon wrote it.

0
9

[–] sane [S] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Salon is indeed 'left of left' and semi far left, its basically socialist propaganda. Proof :

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/salon/

Dance on Salon.com's grave

0
2

[–] rndmvar 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

People shipped salt to NYT under the #SendEmSalt troll campaign.
I'd like to humbly suggest:
#SendEmGasNMatches

0
1

[–] sane [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Hah! You also forgot the now bannable phrase on twitter , facebook, youtube, instagram, snapchat :

#LearnToCode

0
3

[–] polygeek 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I'm happy to see this happen to blatantly one-sided sites. Who wants to pay for part of a poorly researched or intentionally misleading story? The other part of what is going on too is GOOG and FB are sucking the air out of the room for ad revenues on the "free" (ad-supported) sites: http://fortune.com/2017/01/04/google-facebook-ad-industry/