[–] GizaDog 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Salon Shouldn’t Have Unpublished Its Article by a Pedophile Author
https://www.thecut.com/2017/02/salon-shouldnt-have-unpublished-its-pedophilia-article.html
[–] NosebergShekelman 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
oy vey we must use goytard taxpayer money to bail them out!! Shaloms™✡️
[–] One-Way_Bus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It's what they want sadly. Likely may happen.
[–] One-Way_Bus 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
You're right. The (((SEC))) will protect them.
[–] 18629025? 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
From Salon:
Could President Trump, Justice Clarence Thomas and a Kentucky teenager make it harder for liberals to criticize conservatives by redefining what constitutes defamation in the United States? Nick Sandmann appears determined to do that.
Can anyone guess what I changed in this quote? It is obvious if you consider Salon wrote it.
[–] sane [S] 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago (edited ago)
Salon is indeed 'left of left' and semi far left, its basically socialist propaganda. Proof :
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/salon/
Dance on Salon.com's grave
[–] polygeek 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
I'm happy to see this happen to blatantly one-sided sites. Who wants to pay for part of a poorly researched or intentionally misleading story? The other part of what is going on too is GOOG and FB are sucking the air out of the room for ad revenues on the "free" (ad-supported) sites: http://fortune.com/2017/01/04/google-facebook-ad-industry/
[–] One-Way_Bus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
(((Someone))) is getting an insane golden parachute payout that no one in the (((SEC)) will question. I remember when MSN tried to partner with their crap "news" a couple decades ago. They produce nothing of value and never will.
[–] sane [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
THEY HAD A $107 million IPO!?! Jeeebus I forgot that. What a fiasco! :
https://www.politico.com/media/story/2016/05/the-fall-of-saloncom-004551
Anyway, golden parachutes are ONLY if firing a person, not quitting or going bankrupt, UNLESS less than 2 years (typically 90 days) of earnest compensation from all causes.
So no golden parachute to question.
[–] One-Way_Bus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Maybe (((they))) did the looting for decades and still get to walk away with the bank.
I didn't realize that got a massive IPO payout. I mean, how does any (((bank))) assess the value of their fake internet news stock?
I need to find a scam like this.