[–] AlaskaMountain 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
On a more personal/emotional level, a while ago I watched a video where a woman told about her experience being raised by "two dads". As I recall the "dada" soon split and she lived most of her ch ildhood woth one of them who engaged in all the stereotypical gay behaviors. Mostly constant hookups/promiscuity and substance abuse. As an adult the daughter says she has no respect for her "parents" and warns against gay marriage and gay parenting.
I'm sure it's been taken down as a hate video by now. This was 7 or 8 years ago before the Obeefell supreme court ruling.
[–] OneOfTheBoys 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
That's Harpist Moira Greyland
https://youtube.com/user/moiragreyland
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37494480-the-last-closet
Edit: or maybe not, but Moria is a good example of your point.
[–] GunsSaveLives 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
I'm pretty sure that if you shared this on almost any website other than Voat, it would be taken down instantly.
I've seen pro-lgbt people argue that the FRC statistics about 33% of child molesters being gay are wrong because the child molester is otherwise a straight man who only has sex with adult women, and he's only being counted as "gay" or "bi" because he's preying on male children. What would you say to counter that argument?
[–] slickleg64 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Would say that's a strawman argument, where is the proof. Or are they saying being gay is a choice.
Either way there is no point arguing with sodomites who have already made their life mistakes. They wont change.
[–] ephesians5_11 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I've seen pro-lgbt people argue that the FRC statistics about 33% of child molesters being gay are wrong because the child molester is otherwise a straight man who only has sex with adult women...What would you say to counter that argument?
Sadly, I don't think there's anything you CAN say to counter it. That is, if someone is already so far gone that they're willing to twist words and create new definitions of "gay" and "straight" which happen to conform to their worldview, then I doubt that there's any evidence you can present to them to change their mind. I guess these arguments would have to be taken on a case-by-case basis; I doubt there's any "smoking gun" argument which would work in every case.
Great question!!
[–] GunsSaveLives 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Thank you. I think I agree with all you just said. It is frustrating to argue with people who start trying to redefine the accepted meaning of words halfway through a conversation.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
[–] Tallest_Skil 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
You should see the chapter in my book on the subject. Make your skin crawl.
[–] Delacourt 0 points 13 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago (edited ago)
Thank you for making this. This is a great list of redpills to spread. Since they are peer-reviewed studies they are impossible for anyone logical to simply deny.
One phenomenal study I noticed wasn't included was one that showed the average homosexual man has almost 1000 different sexual partners over their lifetime. This figure was contrasted with the far smaller number of sexual partners for the average person, and even differed radically from that of the average lesbian. I wish I could remember the name but it was very revealing.
EDIT: Not the average, but 28% had over 1000 and 43% had over 500. https://carm.org/statistics-homosexual-promiscuity
[–] TheAntiZealot 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
I dispute peer-reviewed studies frequently.
However, I don't treat people with mistrust when they share information that challenges the well-funded and popular narrative.
I expect arguments and ideas to stand in their own logic and evidence.
Using peer-reviewed studies is a great way to counter those who worship popular science and trust only their secular priests for information.
[–] Delacourt 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
That's a fair point. I misspoke, just because a study comes to a conclusion doesn't mean the study is right. There are entire fields that exist due to manipulating the conduct and outcome of scientific studies.
[–] ephesians5_11 [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Thanks for the feedback! I really appreciate it. I'll look for the "1000 sexual partners" study before too long; I'm still working on compiling studies, I just thought that given the post yesterday and your comments, it was about time to post what I have thus far.
Thanks again!
[–] finix_666 ago
Is there an exact sentence saying that in a paper? Would love to read it.
[–] Delacourt ago
Did a quick web search, this probably references the study I remember reading:
https://carm.org/statistics-homosexual-promiscuity
Still ridiculously extreme.