[+]18537486?1 point2 points3 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]18537486?1 point
2 points
3 points
(+3|-1)
ago
(edited ago)
I don't understand how this is proof.
By the time of the Q post Rod Rosenstein's job was in doubt. It was all over the news. In fact, in looking up this comment, I came across this in on of the articles "If Rosenstein is dismissed—this week or next, this month or in six months—it would surprise only those who choose to be surprised."
Rosenstein was on the chopping block
Let's look at the timeline. All of these news stories appear a full month before the Q post
April 10 CNN Trump considering firing Rosenstein to check Mueller
April 12 Politico Trump meeting stokes fears he may oust Rosenstein
April 13 NBC Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein tells confidants he is prepared to be fired
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein today announced that Edward O’Callaghan will serve as the Acting Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General.
So lots and lots of people thought Rod Rosenstein might be fired in the spring of 2018 and Edward O’Callaghan was next in the line of succession.
This seem close to conventional wisdom, rather than some proof. It was definitely widely discussed in the press Especially when Rosenstein stayed on the job until Mueller issued his report.
[–]18541683?0 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
You linked to the DOJ line of succession, which has the associate attorney general as #3. When I search that position, it’s Jesse Panuccio, not Ed. From Feb 2018, so he also would’ve been at the time of the Q post. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Panuccio
Also the fact that Whitaker was appointed to acting AG, which we know was outside of the line of succession because Dems were screaming about it, definitely makes this a Q proof. It appears they don’t have to follow the succession
[+]18536564?0 points2 points2 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]18536564?0 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
I’m not trying to argue with that at all, way to excited to, as this is definitely another “bigly” proof! What pulled me back over was the watch post that had the exact date and time (2 separate watch posts) of the state of emergency at the border was issued.
[–] 18532837? 0 points 27 points 27 points (+27|-0) ago
This may be the biggest Q proof IMO. Also...speaks to there being a plan that has been in place for a long time.
[–] 18536388? 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
I had to do a double take: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-william-p-barr-announces-edward-o-callaghan-acting-deputy-attorney-general
https://qmap.pub/read/1439
Back and forth. This is absolutely nuts. A year out?! How is this planning so accurate?
My mind if blown. This is so crazy awesome how under control this is.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
[–] 18537486? 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago (edited ago)
I don't understand how this is proof.
By the time of the Q post Rod Rosenstein's job was in doubt. It was all over the news. In fact, in looking up this comment, I came across this in on of the articles "If Rosenstein is dismissed—this week or next, this month or in six months—it would surprise only those who choose to be surprised."
April 10 CNN Trump considering firing Rosenstein to check Mueller
April 12 Politico Trump meeting stokes fears he may oust Rosenstein
April 13 NBC Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein tells confidants he is prepared to be fired
In the DOJ 3 replaces 2.
The DOJ has a line of succession and this widely known. In fact one of the first Trump executive orders set the line of succession at the DOJ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13775
and this was discussed a month before the Q post. Here's an article in Politico April 13 What happens if Trump fires Rosenstein
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein today announced that Edward O’Callaghan will serve as the Acting Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General.
So lots and lots of people thought Rod Rosenstein might be fired in the spring of 2018 and Edward O’Callaghan was next in the line of succession.
This seem close to conventional wisdom, rather than some proof. It was definitely widely discussed in the press Especially when Rosenstein stayed on the job until Mueller issued his report.
[–] 18539982? 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
It isn’t proof. (These are Qlowns.)
[–] 18541683? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
You linked to the DOJ line of succession, which has the associate attorney general as #3. When I search that position, it’s Jesse Panuccio, not Ed. From Feb 2018, so he also would’ve been at the time of the Q post. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Panuccio
Also the fact that Whitaker was appointed to acting AG, which we know was outside of the line of succession because Dems were screaming about it, definitely makes this a Q proof. It appears they don’t have to follow the succession
[–] 18534372? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
By Far!!!
[–] 18538824? ago
Semper Fi Barr!
[–] 18540133? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
You misspelled “Fart!!!”
[–] 18536564? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
I’m not trying to argue with that at all, way to excited to, as this is definitely another “bigly” proof! What pulled me back over was the watch post that had the exact date and time (2 separate watch posts) of the state of emergency at the border was issued.