0
27

[–] 18532837? 0 points 27 points (+27|-0) ago 

This may be the biggest Q proof IMO. Also...speaks to there being a plan that has been in place for a long time.

0
12

[–] 18536388? 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

I had to do a double take: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-william-p-barr-announces-edward-o-callaghan-acting-deputy-attorney-general

https://qmap.pub/read/1439

Back and forth. This is absolutely nuts. A year out?! How is this planning so accurate?

My mind if blown. This is so crazy awesome how under control this is.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

4
-4

1
2

[–] 18537486? 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I don't understand how this is proof.

By the time of the Q post Rod Rosenstein's job was in doubt. It was all over the news. In fact, in looking up this comment, I came across this in on of the articles "If Rosenstein is dismissed—this week or next, this month or in six months—it would surprise only those who choose to be surprised."

Rosenstein was on the chopping block Let's look at the timeline. All of these news stories appear a full month before the Q post

April 10 CNN Trump considering firing Rosenstein to check Mueller

April 12 Politico Trump meeting stokes fears he may oust Rosenstein

April 13 NBC Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein tells confidants he is prepared to be fired

In the DOJ 3 replaces 2.

The DOJ has a line of succession and this widely known. In fact one of the first Trump executive orders set the line of succession at the DOJ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13775

and this was discussed a month before the Q post. Here's an article in Politico April 13 What happens if Trump fires Rosenstein

The first person up would be the Justice Department’s No. 3 official, the associate attorney general.

O’Callaghan was number 3. April 3rd https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/deputy-attorney-general-rod-rosenstein-announces-edward-o-callaghan-acting-principal

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein today announced that Edward O’Callaghan will serve as the Acting Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General.

So lots and lots of people thought Rod Rosenstein might be fired in the spring of 2018 and Edward O’Callaghan was next in the line of succession.

This seem close to conventional wisdom, rather than some proof. It was definitely widely discussed in the press Especially when Rosenstein stayed on the job until Mueller issued his report.

2
-2

[–] 18539982? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

It isn’t proof. (These are Qlowns.)

0
2

[–] 18541683? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

You linked to the DOJ line of succession, which has the associate attorney general as #3. When I search that position, it’s Jesse Panuccio, not Ed. From Feb 2018, so he also would’ve been at the time of the Q post. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Panuccio

Also the fact that Whitaker was appointed to acting AG, which we know was outside of the line of succession because Dems were screaming about it, definitely makes this a Q proof. It appears they don’t have to follow the succession

0
2

[–] 18534372? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

By Far!!!

0
0

[–] 18538824? ago 

Semper Fi Barr!

1
-1

[–] 18540133? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

You misspelled “Fart!!!”

0
2

[–] 18536564? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I’m not trying to argue with that at all, way to excited to, as this is definitely another “bigly” proof! What pulled me back over was the watch post that had the exact date and time (2 separate watch posts) of the state of emergency at the border was issued.

6
-5

0
6

[–] 18533435? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

5
-4

0
0

[–] 18533654? [S] ago 

Thanks!

0
1

[–] 18533695? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You're Welcome : )

0
3

[–] 18534487? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Would it be a fair guess that the crumbs are about a year out in most cases?

1
0

[–] 18532608? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Cant open the twat link. Not allowed.

0
1

[–] 18532902? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Sorry it’s my first time posting a link

0
0

[–] 18533299? ago 

Not you. Its twatter. They blocked my access.

0
2

[–] 18536481? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

"reeeeee but muh larp". ha!!! awesome!

doItQ

2
-2

[–] 18534820? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Over a year behind schedule. That is a major problem.

0
2

[–] 18535100? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

or right on schedule

0
1

[–] 18535185? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

planned years in advance.

0
2

[–] 18534502? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

So DECLAS next?

0
2

[–] 18536268? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Does [ED] need to go first, with the naming of a permanent DAG? Is Ed's role just to set things in motion?

0
0

[–] 18629806? ago 

"C" before "D" could be Comey or Callaghan honestly... I'm hoping Comey.

0
1

[–] 18538260? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I also am trying to figure out why Ed is in kill brackets.

0
1

[–] 18535093? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

then PAIN

0
1

[–] 18537409? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Awesome proof :) “C before D”, so....Looks like Comey’s time is up?

load more comments ▼ (20 remaining)