[–] SocksOnCats 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) 1.6 years ago
What’s wrong with 2:53pm? Slides nicely under the radar.
[–] Broc_Lia [S] 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1.6 years ago
What's the relevance?
[–] T1tus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 1.6 years ago (edited 1.6 years ago)
88% of 60 minutes is 53....52.8 actually.
So 2:53
[–] Gravspeed 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 1.6 years ago
Shouldn't that be 3:28? 88th minute after 1400
[–] T1tus 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1.6 years ago
Either are good
[–] SocksOnCats 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 1.6 years ago
Well if it’s decimal time, as OP suggested, it’s 88/100 of the hour: which is about 53 minutes.
I mean, I guess it could go boLth ways.
[–] Gravspeed 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) 1.6 years ago (edited 1.6 years ago)
Im sorry, is this time reich?
Vote for me, I'll make the watches run on time. It'll be pure blitz.
[–] SocksOnCats 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
What’s wrong with 2:53pm? Slides nicely under the radar.
[–] Broc_Lia [S] ago
What's the relevance?
[–] T1tus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
88% of 60 minutes is 53....52.8 actually.
So 2:53
[–] Gravspeed 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Shouldn't that be 3:28? 88th minute after 1400
[–] T1tus ago
Either are good
[–] SocksOnCats 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Well if it’s decimal time, as OP suggested, it’s 88/100 of the hour: which is about 53 minutes.
I mean, I guess it could go boLth ways.