[–] flyawayhigh 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
So, let's take a look at your logic, Mr.Post Hoc Rationalization. :D
Bernie should be held to a special legal standard but others should not be held to it. The rules don't apply to everybody -- only to Bernie -- conveniently to the disadvantage both his campaign and the proposed rule itself.
Bernie = Bernie's legal standard
But then, Bernie should not be held to the very standard he supports -- a phased-in increase.
Bernie != Bernie's standard
These two positions cannot occupy the same space. They are mutually exclusive. Logic fails.