[–] reddfugee43 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Probably because it is a post hoc rationalization. Bernie is not taking the initiative. If $15/hr is the objective, morally right value to be placed on labor then do it. Coming up with excuses like "well, his proposed plan calls for it to be implemented at a certain time, under certain conditions.... he's having a really tough time with finances... etc. etc.." an advocate can always find a rationalization, its what the human brain excels at, and some argue developed explicitly to do (read Jonathan Haidt for some good research on this).
At any rate I'm not interested in advocacy for any candidate, I'm interested in signaling for future actions.
[–] flyawayhigh 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
So, let's take a look at your logic, Mr.Post Hoc Rationalization. :D
Bernie should be held to a special legal standard but others should not be held to it. The rules don't apply to everybody -- only to Bernie -- conveniently to the disadvantage both his campaign and the proposed rule itself.
Bernie = Bernie's legal standard
But then, Bernie should not be held to the very standard he supports -- a phased-in increase.
Bernie != Bernie's standard
These two positions cannot occupy the same space. They are mutually exclusive. Logic fails.