0
0

[–] 18494800? [S] ago 

I repeated the same search and got the same results. This story was on the web since April, why did it break on MSM yesterday?

0
0

[–] 18494841? [S] ago 

Go ahead follow the steps shown in the video, you will get the same results.

0
0

[–] 18495110? ago 

0
3

[–] 18495225? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

This is definitely another fake shooting. However I do not believe this proves it. Last week, on the day of the Seattle crane accident I used this method to find pre-dated stories about it. Just today I searched for "Georgia sprinter javelin" and also found pre-dated stories.

I wonder if organizations are creating article templates each week, then they copy and paste that template when they write a story. So it looks fine because it shows the updated date on the screen, but in the meta-data it shows an creation date from a few days before. That is just my theory -- unless you think the javelined sprinter and the crane accident were also pre-planned.

I still upvoted you because I am crusading to let people know about all the hoax shootings. So far Trump has gone along with all of them, even meeting Las Vegas "survivors" and the poway rabbi. The closest thing we have to calling them out has been Trump Jr retweeting about Hogg's FBI connections. Not even Q has named the hoaxes. Although he did say "Think for yourself. Research for yourself. Trust yourself." Check out 153news.net if you want to do that.

0
1

[–] 18495957? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I looked at the source from one of the April articles and did a search for April. None could be found. I searched for May and it was found.

I can't wrap my head around this one. Where is Google finding the April dates? If your theory is correct, all the dates would be the same from the source posting the article, correct?

This is weird.

0
0

[–] 18496744? ago  (edited ago)

Yeah, this seems to be happening repeatedly. For all we know Google is intentionally fucking with timestamps so if there is a slipup they'll have plausible deniability. More likely it's due to some fuckup on the publisher's side or some SEO tactic (old articles get more "authority" in search algo so publishers play games with metadata?).

0
0

[–] 18496982? ago 

Appreciate you in this comment being open, not typical boomer hurr durr of "dis is proofs!!".

What I feel is habbening.. The IT team at these places is either all automated or partially automated, poorly either way... maybe the iT crew isnt good, or maybe they are smaller than they should be and thus just set.things up to "work" not concerned about small details around the database or site.

In which case that would prob mean reusing the same batch process or something from a week ago in order to push out a new article.

Or not Whatev. Just a thought.,_

0
0

[–] 18496598? ago  (edited ago)

Yeah, I think it's a glitch of some kind as well.

0
1

[–] 18497370? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

This reminds me of when George SR. died twice on the same day. Once in the morning and once in the evening.

0
1

[–] 18498739? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

What are you talking about? Q has repeatedly declared MANY attacks as false flags. He has also said that many real victims are harmed in the pre-planned deep state attacks. That is one thing that is so incredible, if Trump ever confirms his alliance w QTEAM unless they declare it was “disinfo” Q has stated that the modern day false flag is REAL on many different attacks. He was even repeatedly calling it the “democrat playbook.”

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] 18496587? ago 

You can replicate this yourself:

https://www.google.ca/search?q=stem+school+highlands+ranch+shooting&source=lnt&tbs=cdr:1,cd_min:4/4/2019,cd_max:4/30/2019&tbm=

I'm not sure exactly what's going on here, but I suspect it's a tech glitch. Unless something that's archived beforehand can show the presence seems hard to conclusively prove foreknowledge.