If I had to guess, I would say Mason's flirtation with LeVay's stuff had more to do with getting a new audience for his ideas, and partly just to further ideologically separate himself from "Right" wing ZOG-lings. Mason had already done the same thing by supporting Charles Manson, after all.
This isn't wrong, but perhaps there are other ways to go about it. I like to call them wedge issues. They are ideological positions taken simply to keep out ZOG-faggots. People who are under the ideological influence of the ZOG simply won't be able to help themselves from arguing certain things, and this is a sure-fire way to spot them to and to keep them at a distance. Abortion, religion, circumcision, Israel, Hezbollah, etc, etc, can all be turned into wedge issues to separate the wheat from the chaff. Charles Manson and Simon LeVay can also serve that purpose, but in my opinion, could also keep away people who are serious. We don't want to lose any wheat when we do this, and it is better to take issues that are fairly simple to ideologically understand (supporting Manson is easier to understand than supporting Satanism, which could keep out dumb types of Christians who could be useful soldiers, even though Christianity in general is ideological poison).
The fact is that they advocate quality vs quantity
That is one of the ideological weaknesses of both Pierce and Mason; they generally ascribe differences with people to negative personal qualities like cowardice, stupidity, etc, when they should actually view it as evidence of ideological penetration by the Enemy.
When people are consistently wrong on a wide-range of issues dear to the ZOG, it isn't because they're stupid or cowardly. It is because they identify with the ZOG. They are working for it, usually without any pay. They're trying to ideologically disarm would be militants, to bring them back from the brink, to get them to love the ZOG again, to gradually change their ideological outlook to be one that is compatible with the "Right" wing of ZOG.
Not everyone is going to be Earl Turner. There are places for fat losers in the White Nation Liberation War. Not everyone has to be a soldier. You can be a legal, work a job, and give a portion of your income to people who are fighting (there has to be a method for this to work, I have some ideas myself). You can be a legal and do some minor, relatively safe, but still illegal work (housing people on the run from the ZOG, transporting materials to locations, buying materials that would be hard for soldiers to get their hands on due to their status as wanted criminals, etc). You can even produce propaganda material; literature, short stories, shit-posting on comment sections ,etc. In my view, Pierce is more correct than Mason here, but both of them more-or-less unwilling to see ideological differences as treachery and not stupidity and cowardice, which in my opinion, is a mistake.
[–] 18491668? ago
SIEGE does not advocate for hating your people. It only reiterates the Lemming principle which was preached by WLP. You have not read SIEGE and you're only going off of hearsay.
You also say "allies". SIEGE talks in-depth about why big-tentism doesn't work and gives a recount of how it killed GLR's movement after his death. A modern modern example is the TWP's big-tentism which tried to unite "far right" groups like NSM into a big organization. It failed miserably and history will only ever repeat itself.
SIEGE and SIEGEculture are not trying to push for the creation of a national socialist state. It has never once tried to claim to do so. It is fully devoted to the downfall of the current kike owned state, something you seem to enjoy because you understand that the state is NOT owned by our people, NOT for our people, etc. In reality you're against an idea you've formulated about SIEGE and not SIEGE itself.
Satanism is not brought up in SIEGE and Atomwaffen is not the be all, end all of SIEGE. You don't have to be pro-SIEGE and pro-Satanism. You can define to two separately with ease.
Fuck o9a, its not relevant to SIEGE, you're just conflating the two in a dishonest manner.
Fascistforge was ran by spergs who would have been run off of IM. They were not the spiritual successors to IM like they claim to be, they were just faggots.
Stop being a faggot and take the advice we've been giving for years now.
READ SIEGE
[–] 18912578? ago
>>13246350
Well, I guess SEIGE is trash, like EVERYTHING touched by Satanists.
[–] 18491698? ago
To be quite frank, we're going to have to kill a lot of members of our race. A sort of culling if you will. Race mixers and their spawn will be annihilated. White homos will be thrown off of buildings. I can imagine we'll have to put a bullet in a few good goy cohenservatives when they try to stop us for threatening their BASED BEANERS and BASED NIGGERS, and of course for threatening (((God's chosen people))).
[–] 18491673? ago
Wasn't there a couple paragraphs in Siege (or another book by the same author) with a very detailed, fetishistic description of nazis murdering a white baby? I remember someone dumping it in a thread several months ago and it turned basically the entire thread against Siegefags.
[–] 18491688? ago
Why though?
Why kill your own children?
Oh right they got infilitrated by satanists.
[–] 18491675? ago
That's Iron Gates.
Which is o9a shit and is fucking disgusting.