0
0

[–] 18491664? ago 

<hurr it's psyop because it suggests taking action

<vote for zionists and make ineffective memes instead goy

<also atomwaffen suggested a book so that means the book is personally tied to everything atomwaffen says and does

0
0

[–] 18491666? ago 

its a zoomer faggot

0
0

[–] 18491663? ago 

Dig what i'm sayin'?

See wut i'm sayin'?

0
0

[–] 18491705? ago 

anyone who doesn't "dig what he's sayin" is a jew

0
0

[–] 18491661? ago 

satanism is legit

Well they don't import refugees like the Christan's and every other religion does

0
0

[–] 18491660? ago 

0
0

[–] 18485569? ago 

charles manson is not mad at all he is illuminated

maybe a little mad…

0
1

[–] 18485568? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Siegefags have done nothing but kill each over Islam or kill their girlfriend’s parents who wouldn’t allow them to date anymore. So this is the power of Siege revolution

0
0

[–] 18485566? ago 

0
0

[–] 18518440? ago 

Are you trying to brand those that you cannot combat siege fags?

Then by your logic most of us that keep the lights on and all the important facets of infrastructure running are "siege fags".

I wonder what happens when it all just stops moving until people like you are removed.

0
0

[–] 18483731? ago 

If I had to guess, I would say Mason's flirtation with LeVay's stuff had more to do with getting a new audience for his ideas, and partly just to further ideologically separate himself from "Right" wing ZOG-lings. Mason had already done the same thing by supporting Charles Manson, after all.

This isn't wrong, but perhaps there are other ways to go about it. I like to call them wedge issues. They are ideological positions taken simply to keep out ZOG-faggots. People who are under the ideological influence of the ZOG simply won't be able to help themselves from arguing certain things, and this is a sure-fire way to spot them to and to keep them at a distance. Abortion, religion, circumcision, Israel, Hezbollah, etc, etc, can all be turned into wedge issues to separate the wheat from the chaff. Charles Manson and Simon LeVay can also serve that purpose, but in my opinion, could also keep away people who are serious. We don't want to lose any wheat when we do this, and it is better to take issues that are fairly simple to ideologically understand (supporting Manson is easier to understand than supporting Satanism, which could keep out dumb types of Christians who could be useful soldiers, even though Christianity in general is ideological poison).

0
0

[–] 18912591? ago 

Wedge issues

Can you please get a better vocabulary?

Think of 3 words you could use instead of a simpleton word like wedge.

Like you can’t communicate ideas unless you make references to physical objects?

Just stick wedges in everything guys. Just divide the enemy. Split them up. Separate them.

0
0

[–] 18484446? ago 

The fact is that they advocate quality vs quantity, like muscle vs fat, and it's a good principle if applied with the necessary moderation, because you can't have just five super-extremist super-trained guys and change the world, they'll get fucked by the millions of ZOGlings

0
0

[–] 18485562? ago 

The fact is that they advocate quality vs quantity

That is one of the ideological weaknesses of both Pierce and Mason; they generally ascribe differences with people to negative personal qualities like cowardice, stupidity, etc, when they should actually view it as evidence of ideological penetration by the Enemy.

When people are consistently wrong on a wide-range of issues dear to the ZOG, it isn't because they're stupid or cowardly. It is because they identify with the ZOG. They are working for it, usually without any pay. They're trying to ideologically disarm would be militants, to bring them back from the brink, to get them to love the ZOG again, to gradually change their ideological outlook to be one that is compatible with the "Right" wing of ZOG.

Not everyone is going to be Earl Turner. There are places for fat losers in the White Nation Liberation War. Not everyone has to be a soldier. You can be a legal, work a job, and give a portion of your income to people who are fighting (there has to be a method for this to work, I have some ideas myself). You can be a legal and do some minor, relatively safe, but still illegal work (housing people on the run from the ZOG, transporting materials to locations, buying materials that would be hard for soldiers to get their hands on due to their status as wanted criminals, etc). You can even produce propaganda material; literature, short stories, shit-posting on comment sections ,etc. In my view, Pierce is more correct than Mason here, but both of them more-or-less unwilling to see ideological differences as treachery and not stupidity and cowardice, which in my opinion, is a mistake.

load more comments ▼ (14 remaining)