1) Those of us who (not whom) play to win. Again, pet peeve.
2) It's not a matter of PR, it's a matter of values – and consistently living out those values.
3) You call it "weakness"; I call it "high standards". Your call to abandon standards for the sake of fulfilling an objective reflects the fact that you'd abandon the very intellectual tradition you supposedly want to defend. The irony is unsettling.
[–] 18475231? ago
WWJD?
Lose.
EVERY.
SINGLE.
TIME.
[–] 18475232? ago
>>13243658
The Satan reference was a metaphor, dude. Furthermore, not only did you completely miss the point but you have added credence to the argument in my post by providing an example of rhetoric that is illogical, irrelevant, and ugly.