[–]18473248?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
You do your pathetic pr shit, those of us whom play to win will do what must be done to succeed. Cucking out is out of the question. And letting weakness lead is cucking.
[–]18475229?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
1) Those of us who (not whom) play to win. Again, pet peeve.
2) It's not a matter of PR, it's a matter of values – and consistently living out those values.
3) You call it "weakness"; I call it "high standards". Your call to abandon standards for the sake of fulfilling an objective reflects the fact that you'd abandon the very intellectual tradition you supposedly want to defend. The irony is unsettling.
[–] 18475229? ago
1) Those of us who (not whom) play to win. Again, pet peeve.
2) It's not a matter of PR, it's a matter of values – and consistently living out those values.
3) You call it "weakness"; I call it "high standards". Your call to abandon standards for the sake of fulfilling an objective reflects the fact that you'd abandon the very intellectual tradition you supposedly want to defend. The irony is unsettling.
[–] 18475231? ago
WWJD?
Lose.
EVERY.
SINGLE.
TIME.