This does make me think and change my mind. >>13242920 is conflicting as well. Maybe we need a Mr. Roger that calmly and politely talks about jewish disgust of nonjews and how they use media in an effort to destroy western civilization. I don't know how you combine real life politically correct with beauty, respect, and virtue.
[–] 18473230? ago
But utilitarian pragmatism does not reconcile well with traditional conservatism. It doesn't matter that these tactics "work": they are inherently contradictory to beauty, logic, and virtue. What is being conveyed is not a proper, respectable worldview, but a banal corruption. The ends do not justify the means, in other words.
[–] 18473248? ago
You do your pathetic pr shit, those of us whom play to win will do what must be done to succeed. Cucking out is out of the question. And letting weakness lead is cucking.
[–] 18475229? ago
1) Those of us who (not whom) play to win. Again, pet peeve.
2) It's not a matter of PR, it's a matter of values – and consistently living out those values.
3) You call it "weakness"; I call it "high standards". Your call to abandon standards for the sake of fulfilling an objective reflects the fact that you'd abandon the very intellectual tradition you supposedly want to defend. The irony is unsettling.