[–] [deleted] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] Sorahzahd 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

If that's the case, you won't mind providing a detailed rebuttal on why we should all be perfectly fine with the increasingly dire situation at Fukushima.

Or are you going to claim that's it's all cleaned up now? Or that the other reactors won't be subject to meltdown at some point in the near future?

You haven't backed up anything you're claiming.

Edit: Oh look, downvotes, no reply, and the guy who was claiming to be an expert has since deleted his comment. SURPRISE SURPRISE /s

1
0

[–] Racer_the_observer 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

When it happened I suggested bombing the place with concrete, like Chernoble. Nobody wanted to discuss it. Now here we are, the pacific ocean is being sterilized, and nobody wants to discuss ways to stop this thing. I hear all these ideas to slow it down, but nobody wants to step forward and do something. I say fuck the japanese and their government, start bombing the dam reactors with concrete. Or something. Leaving it in their hands is not getting anything done.

1
0

[–] Hokie200proof 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Does Japan want mirelurks? Because this is how you get mirelurks .

0
2

[–] Fagtardicus 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

one mans freakish mutant is anothers porn muse

0
1

[–] Hokie200proof 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

That's not... Wrong. Jesus. Tentacle porn is a good case study of "prohibition is never the answer" .

2
0

[–] Snivy 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

It's really sad how ignored this is. Every 4-5 months a scientist, or a group of them, comes out and says this is a problem....yet no one does anything about it. It just blows my mind that so many countries that are going to be affected by this are just letting it happen.

0
0

[–] 1221462? ago 

goddamnit. Can't we just get some good news for once?

0
1

[–] NinjaPeppers 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I don't understand the implications of this event. Can someone please explain it to me?

As far as I know small chunks of radioactive material are being carried into the Pacific Ocean and potentially destroying sea life. This is all as a result of the Fukushima nuclear accident that was a result of poor reactor design and an earthquake. Anything else worth knowing?

1
0

[–] Sorahzahd 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

The main point here is that the cleanup "efforts" are shit and aren't doing anything, and that the exact nature and seriousness of Fukushima is being downplayed on a global scale.

For one thing, I've yet to see many people acknowledge the fact that the other reactors will meltdown sooner or later, because of the ongoing failure to contain the first one.

So imagine this problem, but with 4 reactors no one can clean up spewing radiation into the ocean. That's what we have in store, and what is being downplayed and ignored by MSM.

0
0

[–] NinjaPeppers ago 

Well that is pretty messed up. What can people outside of Japan do about this?

0
2

[–] Rbbrnts 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Great! So how long do we have until we have to worry about Godzilla?

1
2

[–] selrahc007 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

For every 7cm of water, radiation level is cut in half. I'm not seeing any problem here.

0
3

[–] vicarious 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Do you have any source for that ? It's the first time I read such a claim. If that's really the case, does that mean that there is virtually no radiation left after 1m of water ? Then why don't we just throw all our radioactive waste in the sea ?

2
0

[–] repoman 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago  (edited ago)

The sea has a tendency to churn about what with tides and waves and all. It also has a tendency to corrode metal rods a bit faster than a calm, filtered pool of fresh water. Lastly, most commercial fishermen do not fish in spent fuel pools as opposed to the ocean.

1
3

[–] selrahc007 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

http://what-if.xkcd.com/29/ It's not like some government-approved paper or anything, but he used to work at NASA so I usually trust his info.

0
7

[–] MonitoredCitizen 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

That was a comic about a pool of contained, nonmoving water you were looking at, where water's effectiveness as a shield was being considered. With the Fukushima plant, the groundwater is flowing and is a radiation contaminant conveyance, not a shield. The contaminated groundwater is carrying Strontium and Plutonium, among other radioactive elements, to the ocean where it is able to come into direct contact with life. See the part about "touching your elbows to ..." in the text.

0
0

[–] selrahc007 ago 

So the problem is not about radioisotopes flowing into the pacific, but staying in groundwater. Glad for the correction

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)