[–] JeremiahSinclair [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
You're entitled to your opinion, and so am I. That's how this works. My respectfully disagreeing with you doesn't imply that I'm not acting like a professional, and there's nothing "inaccurate" about cover elements that are SYMBOLS to begin with. In literature and art, a symbol is something that represents something else without being literal. They've been used for book covers for works in all genres, for all of publishing history, since the invention of the printing press. Your interpretation of those symbols and what they mean AND the effect they will have on other people is totally, 100% subjective. Sorry, that's a fact.
I appreciate your input and have taken it into account, but being on a self-righteous high horse doesn't automatically make you correct.
[–] septimasexta 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Not self-righteous. I have professional creds in art and design. I DO judge a book by its cover. LOL!
[–] JeremiahSinclair [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Hahah yes, everyone judges books by their covers...which is really the purpose of a book cover, despite the old saying. But there's nothing "inaccurate" about design elements that don't convey factual information to begin with. I think guns are a pretty accurate symbol for Pizzagate in general anyway, regardless of what happened at Comet Ping Pong.