well i say that because of the influx traffic coming in you know its inevitable. sorry about your siege copy that sucks. glad you had someone to recieve it though. im listening to the audio book for the 5th time. wish we could just flood the formal publication scenes on a mass scale instead of leaving it to these different faction movement leaders. i liked mason for the same reason i enjoy tom metzger. they both were in the actual parties back when they could exist (metzger came from the john birch society then headed the cali kkk) but saw how they became honeypots and were generally disorganized, or useless from plants or infighting. they advocated the lone wolf strategy which is good because those lone unconnected wolves culminating actions will allow for more resilient networks later. i mean you still want to connect but only if you can verify them as not being spooks
This text falsely assumes all men to be individuals in a state of mutual competition; it ignores kin selection. Individuals are merely instances of a genetic profile: your people share most of your genes. By helping your folk to reproduce, you can pass on your genes far more than you could ever do alone. This is biologically the root of both altruism and spite.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kin_selection
Might is Might is useful only as a refutation of christianity, and a wake up call to the reality of violence in the world. It is otherwise an anarchistic and hedonistic text advocating for violence against one's own people. Verbatim quotations from the text constitute large portions of the Satanist "Satanic Bible" not even making that up.
Every NS should read this book, and every NS should be able to refute it.
nice post especially the kin selection reference. i see entirely what youre saying individuals being instances of a gene but i feel its a two way road. the gene needs to adapt for more survivable instances in the process. we get in a false dichotomy to a degree with collectives and individuals when they are bipartisan forces of one process. in our genetic instances currently weve taken on some debilitating traits for overall survivability and this itself may be an ebb and flow "morphogenetic" cycle to ultimately breed better instances. so what im saying is in a time of weakness in the face of collapsing societies and traditions where those in your genetic family are ultimately self destructive one would have to incorporate elements of hedonism and even anarchy. if our collective is weak in certain elements itll breed other elements to clean it out like antibodies. this is played out in individual instances as conquerers historically it seems. but again satanic anything is kind of uncreative garbage.
Interesting take. However, those best able to protect the ability of a group to survive and reproduce have traditionally been rewarded by access to reproduction. Women are evolved to desire these traits, because they allow kin selection to function without succumbing to the issues you describe. I would even say that ensuring men are selected for on this basis is a large part of what constitutes "culture". I do see merit in your dualistic take and I agree that there is room for competition within a group as long as it does not jeopardize the unity of a group.
8 CHAN SERVER
N.T. Technology, Inc.
200 Paul Ave
San Francisco, CA 94124
8 CHAN
N.T. Technology, Inc.
Suite 5901
9120 Double Diamond Parkway
Reno, NV 89521
8 CHAN OWNER JIM WATKINS
Race Queen (RQI), Inc.
2303 Cityland 10 Tower 1, 156 H.V.
Dela Costa St. Makati City, Philippines
8 CHAN REGISTAR
tucows
96 Mowat Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
What do you think you will accomplish spamming this in every thread, kike? It's public knowledge and this is our home, why would we do anything with that information? Anyone who would (you won't, you're all cowards) is not going to be here anyway and already know to begin with.
I am familiar with this book. I have often seen it associated with Satanism which has always put me off of it. Also is it known exactly who wrote it? I recall reading it was a fairly well known author under a pseudonym but I can't remember who at the moment
yeah nobody has claim on a natural idea. like i think its retarded if your going against christianity to take up the banner of its antithetical. if you dislike it throw the whole brood out but in another way the satanic groups might have a sensible thing to say but i discount him because he flies a flag for an ideal that never allows him to truly oppose what he wants to oppose. his opposition is his belief and i guess the abrahamic god but why would you worship the abrahamic devil lol. thats why satanism puts me off
Things are more nuanced than the book but yes.
[–] 18401090? ago