0
14

[–] 18386957? 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yep law enforcement offices in no way should be able to generate revenue form their jobs. It's a conflict of interest through and through. Not from speeding tickets, not from seized assits. All of the money earned should go to repairing the roads and what not. If you leave that kind of profit motive in their path it will only lead to the abuse of the people.

1
4

[–] 18387014? [S] 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

I agree.

1
6

[–] 18386528? 1 point 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

Cities and towns have been overburdened by Mexican immigration, Mexicans that don't pay taxes while using public schools, hospitals, public housing, roads, etc., while putting an immense strain on the court system and law enforcement.

Police forces, bulked up by necessity due to the massive influx of people, don't have the tax dollars to operate. I don't think civil forfeiture is right when a person has not been charged with a crime or charged with a crime that is not associated with income. The underlying issue is that Mexican replacement immigration is placing an undue burden that can't be met with taxes. The White people are already taxed to the max and becoming homeless, you can't squeeze even $250 dollars more out of them without putting hundreds or even thousands of White people out on the street.

1
-1

[–] 18388568? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Nah, this is a reaganism run amok. It's cheaper govt because it balances it's budget with state sanctioned theft. No theft, no toys no job...keep stealing!!

7
-5

0
3

[–] 18388462? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Government is the disease posing as cure. The official gang of their turf.

0
3

[–] 18388415? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

LAw enforcement took so much stuff that burglars had nothing left to steal and so the number of burglaries went down...

0
3

[–] 18386643? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Who exactly is in support of civil asset forfeiture?

1
7

[–] 18386758? [S] 1 point 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

The police.

0
6

[–] 18387034? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

My DA supported it in his campaign as a way to keep taxes low. I do not agree.

0
4

[–] 18387547? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

So "If we can blatantly steal then we might not raise your extortion rates" was his pitch? Can't say I disagree with you prefering higher rates, extortion is just the more civil option as opposed to "civil" asset forfeiture.

0
0

[–] 18387071? ago 

Jews

0
2

[–] 18388552? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The govt prosecutes thieves.

It hates competition

0
2

[–] 18388066? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

BIGGEST GANG IS THE BOYS IN BLUE.

0
1

[–] 18387709? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

To what extent are they taking stuff from blacks and mexicans, as opposed to white people?

0
2

[–] 18388071? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

im white, cops took my stuff and raided my house because niggers i didn't know, shot each other out front. lost a HK 45 :(

1
0

[–] 18389067? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Probably a fake story but you should have killed them.

0
0

[–] 18388574? ago 

To what extent do niggers and spics have anything worth stealing?

0
0

[–] 18388014? ago 

99%/1% that's why the left is so strongly against it. If it was rich, white criminals, the Dems would be in full support.

0
0

[–] 18388086? ago 

In actuality is that 1% funding the campaigns against the 1%. They want to replace this with a system that has no social mobility. Maybe similar to Maduro's system in Venezuela. There, under socialism, the 1% continues to enjoy their country club and the good life, while 99% starve.

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)