[–] the_Green_Chain 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
He needs to fry. "In order to get a FISA warrant, you need an affidavit signed by a career law enforcement officer who swears the information is true... And if it is wrong, that person is going to face consequences." RR
[–] the_Green_Chain 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
RR - "The blame for election interference belongs to the criminals who committed election interference. We need to work together to hold the perpetrators accountable, and keep moving forward to preserve our values, protect against future interference, and defend America."
[–] the_Green_Chain 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
HRC - "In almost every profession - whether it's law or journalism, finance or medicine or academia or running a small business - people rely on confidential communications to do their jobs. We count on the space of trust that confidentiality provides. When someone breaches that trust, we are all worse off for it." "Rely on confidential communications" hmmm.
[–] Jonny_Ninja 1 point 10 points 11 points (+11|-1) ago (edited ago)
Sadly, 95% of the baboons on this board won't even give this a passing thought and they'll continue to hate Rosenstein.
Me? I reserve judgement because I'm intellectually honest enough to know that I don't know everything.
I wouldn't put it past the maestro to have set this up where both RR and RM are part of the storm.
In fact, it's more likely than not in my opinion. But in any case, we need to see what happens before we start damning some of these people to Gitmo and such.
And I guaran-fucking-tee that 99% of the dumbasses around here would have been hating Sessions had Q not told them to "trust Sessions." People seem to miss that Q expects us to look into some of this shit and put 2 and 2 together on our own. RR and RM definitely qualify as examples of this. Cates does fantastic work. Easily a better journalist than anyone on TV, and I mean ANYONE.
[–] GodsAngell 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
This was an extremely insightful article! Thank-you for posting! I'm going to circulate now.
[–] redtoe_skipper ago
You guys should read what Q 3312 said about white hat shit.
Rosenstein's letter is a perfect example for optics. It is against those rabid lefty Dems.
He is controlled. It seems like you guys cannot see the difference between white hat and a controlled black hat.
And as I have said in a different thread: misinformation is needed, is the skyhook used to pervert the obvious. You may start with Uranium 1.
My question is: why is it so goddamn important to label Mueller and Rosenstein as whitehats? What is your vested interest?
[–] Blacksmith21 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Q said RR and RM are linked. Either both are good, both are bad. Cates has been saying RR is on the good side for over a year. I have to think Mueller has been doing the same.
There were zero leaks from the Mueller team. Not one ounce of "impropriety" in terms of investigation, which makes me think it was a White Hat operation. The Dems are too sloppy and had it been a Deep State op there would have been all sorts of links, scandals, etc. coming from the Special Counsel. Mueller's "reputation" + Dems/MSM stupidity over the Russia BS, kept them thinking RM was going to indict.
FWIW - I think both Rosenstein and definitely Mueller have some serious dirt on them, but that's what made them perfect for their roles.
Surprise! Not happening Dems.
[–] suomy_the_nona ago
Maybe to understand why RR was nominated for that job it's useful to read some parts of the nomination debate. The full text is in "Congressional Record", APRIL 25, 2017: https://www.congress.gov/crec/2017/04/25/CREC-2017-04-25-senate.pdf
With ctrl-F you can search inside for "Rosenstein".
It seems like he was chosen because he did every job unbiased like he did again this time.
Two examles:
Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-IL):
We need a Deputy Attorney General [...], who is highly competent and has the independence to say no to the President and to the Attorney General when necessary. Rod Rosenstein has served as the U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland since 2005 under both Democratic and Republican Presidents. I do not question his experience or his competence. As a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I looked closely at his nomination. I asked him many questions in the hearing. I sent some followup letters, and I appreciate that he has been forthcoming in his responses. Mr. Rosenstein has pledged to be an independent voice and has committed that he will not recommend any changes in Justice Department policies until he evaluates them, discusses them with appropriate officials, and determines that changes are warranted.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA):
Furthermore, Mr. Rosenstein comes with high recommendations from a bipartisan list of former Attorneys General and Deputy Attorneys General. And he comes with high recommendations from his home state Senators, current and former.
So it was one of the few bipartisan decisions in the last two years.
The only negative opinion I found was from Blumenthal...
[–] redtoe_skipper ago
And the unbiased Rosenstein first tried to get His buddy Mueller cemented in place. You know that Mueller with the impeccable reputation, who got an extention of term by act of Congress..... The one Mueller who did his part to fuck 9/11 investigation?
Theunbiased Rosenstein who fights tooth and nail not to have the truth come out? Who wrote the scope memo, who covered up Un U1?
That Rosenstein.
[–] WhisperingPine 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Well Well Lookie what I found !! https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download
[–] rickki6 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
love his articles