[–] 8_billion_eaters [S] ago
Left Queen [Q1] to left Queen 4 is not a possible move. Q1 has a pawn blocking her path.
[–] LordHuggington 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
I don't know - this looks like it could be a fun variant of chess. It's OK to try new things for recreation and learning.
[–] 8_billion_eaters [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I'll post an image of your next move.
You will probably beat me if you know how to play chess. I'm not all that good.
[–] Gingercuntfirecrotch 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
How would you know who won considering you’re both playing for the same thing. First king down? Second? First piece?
[–] 8_billion_eaters [S] 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Winner is the last man standing.
[–] Tinfoil_Kippah 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
e5
[–] 8_billion_eaters [S] 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
e5 means nothing.
You can't move any piece to e5 if the fucking game board was divided into 1-8 and A-H.
YOU'RE BANNED FOR LIFE bye
[–] 8_billion_eaters [S] 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago (edited ago)
The only change in rules is that your pawn can move side to side ONLY on it's spawn row.
...and the first pawn to reach the opponents base row gets [choice] of a knight or bishop. The 2nd pawn can only get [choice] a knight, bishop or rook. Queens after that.
edit: Queens or [choice] after that. ..in some cases, you may want a knight more than a queen.
[–] 8_billion_eaters [S] ago
You're right. But the rules stand. The 1st move has no effect on the understanding of the rules.
My bad.
Let's play.
[–] 8_billion_eaters [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
There is no time limit on your move. :::looks at watch:::
Did I mention that?
[–] SithEmpire 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Question which is making me too curious not to ask - in Lesbian Chess, what is the win condition?
I'm not sure if it would be taking both/all opposing queens, taking one queen, etc. Whether players have to call 'check' if a queen is threatened or the final queen is threatened is also unclear, though scrapping the rule is fine (I'm actually for removing check/checkmate from regular chess and replace the whole thing with 'just take the king').
Also:
[–] 8_billion_eaters [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The REAL object of Lesbian Chess is to make your opponent grovel in surrender.
Crush your enemy... See them scatter before you. Listen to the lamentations of their pawns.
[–] rejectedfromreddit ago
Calling check wouldn't work. The king is distance-limited and can't generally kill the attacker if they're more than a square away.
Queens would have to be a trade in this system, so it would fail without a massive oversight on one side.
[–] 8_billion_eaters [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
The object of Lesbian Chess is to kill all your opponents. ...or make them surrender if they can't escape. If they can make 5 moves [run away] when given no other option.... it's a draw.
[–] varialus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Original post stated that's it's a fight to the death. That means you have to kill all the opponents' pieces.