0
1

[–] prairie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Does your government need a tune-up?

0
1

[–] lord_nougat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Guillotines are even more stylish, in my ever so humble opinion.

But the enemy does not really deserve that level of compassion.

1
3

[–] ccjunky77 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

This is way past due!

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] lord_nougat ago 

Scaffolds for president!

Well... maybe not our current president.

(In minecraft)

0
6

[–] Splooge 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The starter kit is pretty cheap, but that's because you always need tons of expansion packs. That's how they getcha.

0
1

[–] SandHog 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

No built in fail-safe though. It could use a bear pit at the very least.

0
1

[–] lord_nougat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Ae man, I thought you said BEER pit for a moment there.

0
8

[–] sonickid101 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Jacobins tried this. I'd prefer the non-aggression approach so noone not deserving of it accidentally loses their heads. Even though there is no shortage of those deserving of it.

0
0

[–] eat_shit_and_die ago 

It is impossible to fix things without collateral damage. We don't have that luxury. We are in a mortal fight for the future of all humanity. It may be that we must kill 9 innocents for every ONE traitor.... that's just the way it is.

We may be placed in a situation where we knowingly MUST kill some innocents in order to kill the traitors. Nature is not the sunshine and lollipops play-world that you were promised. We are in a place where you must KILL to ensure the survival of the species, and the morality of killing will not be a clear-cut, black and white equation.

Disabuse yourself of these infantile notions of "fair play" and "justice for all individuals" and you will understand the true nature of the situation we find ourselves embroiled in.

0
0

[–] sonickid101 ago 

You choke out a fire by starving it of fuel. Killing people tends to put gasoline on the fire. And harming 9 innocents to kill 1 enemy is a good way to make more enemies really quick. These people don't live in a vacuum they have family and friends that get pissed off when you kill the wrong people the same thing happens in Yemen when we bomb 1 terrorist at a wedding. Now you've made a whole bunch of new angry terrorists. There's no strategy or tactics in what you're saying.

0
0

[–] CameraCode0 ago 

Yeah but how do you get them to voluntarily give up their power without violence, and keep them away?

0
0

[–] sonickid101 ago 

The same way you choke out a fire starve it of fuel. Killing people tends to put gasoline on the fire.

0
1

[–] prairie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The best approach is non-participation. Let it whither from non-use. Requires full participation of the citizens, a truly democratic decision.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]