Any hierarchy is based on the pure balance of power, that is, the ability to exercise domination through coercion by one's enemies.
Do you view family hierachies the same way, where the father's own wife and kids are his enemy? If so, then you're part of the problem, nothing different from a sodomite kike.
https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=1FUxefT7WmA :
Wo alle Straßen enden ✠ [German soldier song][+ english translation] - YouTube
This is about coopting the idea and inverting it, read the OP you niggers.
I find that materialism is an easy vice to purge, there are (((some))) who are innately greedy but when most men get removed from the mainstream culture they quickly drop it, provided you show them a new meaning to find in life. Certainly you should prioritize men who are less materialistic but in 2019 you may have a hard time finding them, so if you can't just look for men who are on the pipeline (politically incorrect leftists -> libertarians -> civnats -> ethnats) and are competent at some sort of skill or trade.
Women are materialistic by default but they're also malleable if you aren't a pushover. Really the only requirements you need are that she be a virgin and white, if you're older and not unusually charismatic you may need to soften on the first requirement though or simply opt to devote yourself entirely to the cause through some other means by ignoring women maybe nonvirgins aren't that bad I wouldn't know.
[–] 18453344? ago
"Intersectionality" is CultMarx realizing that ad hoc tribal grievance is inherently unstable, and trying to duct tape black nationalists and Islamists and feminists and Chicanos into a Katamari Damacy ball of political opportunism.
It's a dumb solution to a dumb problem.
Instead of repeating CultMarx insanity we should reject purity spiralling and accept people that are pretty much three-fourths on board. Dennis Prager is a Zionist and an apologist for the Talmud, but apart from that he's good. Peter Thiel is a homosexual but apart from that he's good. Look at the full spread of the Dark Enlightenment chart and recognize the true diversity.
[–] 18453347? ago
While to some extent, guarding against purity spiral is necessary, some of your proposals leave us back, ultimately, in the position we find ourselves. To truly satisfy what you describe, I would think pure sepratism would be necessary in the end, with a "I don't tread on you, you don't tread on me" kind of attitude between you and said Zionists, homosexuals, etc, except at a State level. Certainly that would be most preferable to satisfy the empathetic drive, but practically speaking I think it would just be a retreat and put anyone trying to save, or rebirth, the West in a position of weakness once again and simply allow them to be carved up once more in century's or several decades' time.
There is a reason for purity spiral and it is bore out of a desire to shore up points of weakness. Eventually you must declare the product safe, however. But if you consistently allow even small things, well, that's eventually how you get the MIGApedes. I don't think there's really a better, more textbook example. Malice is the wrong approach to take, I agree, but that doesn't mean those things falling outside of the window of acceptibility in such fundemental fashion should be tolerated within confines of said window, so to speak.